Skip to main content
Advertisement

Sunset Manor Avera Health: CPR Readiness Failure - SD

Healthcare Facility:

The training gap emerged during a federal inspection following an incident involving resident 52. Inspectors found that while the facility had policies requiring staff to know which residents wanted resuscitation attempts, managers had performed no auditing or monitoring to ensure workers understood these critical distinctions.

Sunset Manor Avera Health facility inspection

CNA J told inspectors she had watched orientation training videos but received no specific education about resident code statuses. She knew the information was available in the electronic medical record and on hall sheets that staff carried while working, but had not been taught how to use it in emergencies.

Advertisement

The facility's October 2025 resuscitation policy stated that staff should initiate medical emergency procedures for any resident needing resuscitation "unless there is a 'Do Not Resuscitate' order documented in the resident's electronic medical record." The policy required providing basic life support and CPR "prior to the arrival of emergency medical services, subject to physician order and resident choice indicated in the resident's advance directives."

Two licensed practical nurses demonstrated better understanding during interviews. LPN L, who started working at the facility in an unspecified month, explained she would not start CPR on a resident with a DNR code status if the resident was unresponsive with no pulse or respirations. She said she had received general education regarding advance directives and code status.

LPN D, who also started in an unspecified month, told inspectors she would check a resident's code status before beginning CPR in an emergency. She had received mandatory education about advance directives and code statuses.

The facility's advance directive policy, reviewed during the inspection, stated: "It is the policy of this facility will provide basic life support, including CPR Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, when a resident requires such emergency care." The policy specified that nurses were educated to initiate CPR as recommended by the American Heart Association "unless: A valid Do Not Resuscitate order is in place."

Director of Nursing B could not provide signed documentation showing which nursing staff attended a meeting held after resident 52's incident. The meeting was intended to address the code status confusion that had emerged from the emergency.

Managers acknowledged they had not audited whether staff members were aware of expectations regarding life-sustaining measures according to residents' code statuses. They also admitted performing no monitoring to ensure residents' code statuses were properly identified after the incident with resident 52.

The inspection revealed that while the facility provided education on advance directives and resident code statuses during new hire orientation and annual training, the system had failed for at least one worker. CNA J's case demonstrated how a certified nursing assistant could begin working in direct patient care without understanding when to attempt resuscitation.

Hall sheets containing resident information were supposed to travel with staff as they worked, providing immediate access to code status information during emergencies. However, the lack of specific training meant workers might not know how to interpret or act on this critical information when seconds mattered.

The facility's policies appeared comprehensive on paper, requiring staff to distinguish between residents who wanted full resuscitation efforts and those with do-not-resuscitate orders. But the implementation gap left at least one worker unprepared to make life-or-death decisions during her first week on the job.

Federal inspectors cited the facility for failing to ensure staff received adequate training on advance directives and code statuses, finding minimal harm or potential for actual harm affecting few residents. The violation occurred despite written policies that seemed to address the training requirements.

The case highlighted how policy compliance on paper does not guarantee real-world preparedness when nursing assistants face medical emergencies involving residents with different wishes about end-of-life care.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Sunset Manor Avera Health from 2025-12-31 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

Sunset Manor Avera Health in IRENE, SD was cited for violations during a health inspection on December 31, 2025.

The training gap emerged during a federal inspection following an incident involving resident 52.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at Sunset Manor Avera Health?
The training gap emerged during a federal inspection following an incident involving resident 52.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in IRENE, SD, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from Sunset Manor Avera Health or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 435100.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check Sunset Manor Avera Health's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.