The December 30 inspection found the facility failed to serve palatable, attractive food at safe temperatures to residents. Meal temperatures measured as low as 94 degrees, well below safe serving standards.

Resident 17 described receiving only toast and coffee for breakfast the day before inspectors arrived. When asked about food quality, the resident's assessment was blunt and profane.
Another resident, identified as Resident 2, told inspectors meals were served cold. Resident 16 said she skipped lunch entirely on December 29 because the popcorn chicken "was all breading and it looked horrible."
Inspectors observed the meal preparation process during lunch service on December 29. Kitchen staff ran out of heated plate bases designed to keep food warm, forcing workers to use hot pellets as substitutes. The last meal tray was plated at 12:45 PM but wasn't served to residents until 12:58 PM.
When inspectors tested the temperature of a sample meal tray, they found widespread problems. The popcorn chicken measured 97.5 degrees and was "cold to the taste" with a hard exterior and excessive breading that made it difficult to chew.
Rice on the same tray registered 98.6 degrees and was also cold. Brussels sprouts measured just 94.1 degrees, had turned a "brown/dark green color," and had developed a mushy texture.
Even the dessert was problematic. The pineapple dish with cinnamon crumble topping measured 63.8 degrees and had "a strange combination of flavors," according to the inspection report.
The food quality issues weren't isolated incidents. Resident council meeting minutes from January, February, March and May of 2025 documented ongoing complaints about cold food being served throughout the facility.
By June, cold food was no longer listed among concerns being followed up on, but the December inspection revealed the problems had returned.
Kitchen staff told inspectors they were supposed to use a specific system to keep food warm: a liner base, then a heated pellet in the base, followed by the plate and a dome cover. But the facility didn't have enough bases for all residents.
A kitchen worker identified as [NAME] 1 was observed using hot pellets without the required liner bases when supplies ran short. The worker confirmed to inspectors that they had run out of the proper equipment.
The Dietary Supervisor explained that pellets should be heated until staff cannot touch them, designed to maintain food temperature during transport to residents. However, the supervisor acknowledged the facility lacked sufficient bases for proper meal service.
The supervisor noted there had been complaints about cold food in the past, but claimed that after staff turnover in the kitchen, fewer food complaints had been received in the previous five months.
Despite this assertion, the inspection found residents were still receiving meals that failed to meet basic temperature and quality standards. The violation affected multiple residents across the facility.
Kitchen worker [NAME] 2 confirmed the equipment shortage, telling inspectors that pellets were used when the proper liners weren't available. The worker said pellets were warmed until very hot but cooled enough to touch by the time they reached residents.
The inspection classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm to residents, but documented that some residents were affected by the poor food quality and unsafe temperatures.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to serve food that is palatable, attractive, and at safe temperatures. The Crestwood facility's failure to meet these basic standards left residents with meals that were not only unappetizing but potentially unsafe due to inadequate temperature control.
The facility's equipment shortages and improper food handling procedures resulted in residents receiving cold, unpalatable meals that some refused to eat entirely.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Crestwood Rehabilitation and Nursing from 2025-12-30 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.