Skip to main content
Advertisement

Avantara Norton: Accident Hazard Violations - SD

Healthcare Facility:

The first elopement occurred July 26 when a resident left the facility around 7:30 p.m. Camera footage showed the resident, who used a wheelchair independently, exiting through the locked front door. A certified nursing assistant's badge had disabled the alarm sensor, allowing the door to unlock and the resident to leave undetected.

Avantara Norton facility inspection

Six weeks later on September 12, another wheelchair-bound resident escaped using the same method. At 6:31 p.m., the resident left through the front door after CNAs used their badges to bypass the security system. The badge access released the lock, allowing both staff and the resident to exit together.

Advertisement

Both residents were classified as elopement risks. The facility maintained elopement binders at nurses' stations and the front desk containing photos and information about residents prone to wandering. Despite these precautions, the security system failures went unnoticed until after the residents had already left.

The nursing home's elopement policy, last revised May 14, required staff to evaluate every resident's escape risk upon admission and quarterly thereafter. The policy mandated that personnel immediately report any resident attempting to leave or suspected of going missing to the charge nurse.

Monthly elopement drills were supposed to be conducted, according to facility procedures. The policy also required that residents wanting to leave temporarily must have physician orders and sign out before departure.

When residents returned from unauthorized departures, the director of nursing was supposed to examine them for injuries, contact their physician and family representative, complete incident reports, update medical records and care plans, and conduct new elopement risk evaluations.

Following the July incident, the facility began implementing corrective measures on July 31. These included following quality assurance processes, educating all staff about resident elopements, and ensuring staff presence at the front entrance when residents were nearby.

The nursing home initiated elopement drills starting July 31 and continued them through November 27. Staff received in-service training September 16-17 covering the facility's elopement policy, the identification binders, and which residents posed elopement risks.

Federal inspectors reviewed camera footage of both incidents during their December 30 investigation. The footage confirmed that in each case, staff badge access had disabled the front door's security sensor, creating the opportunity for residents to leave undetected.

Interviews with staff revealed they understood the elopement education they had received. Inspectors observed that personnel were positioned at the front entrance when residents were present in the area, a practice implemented after the July escape.

The facility's weekly and monthly elopement drills showed ongoing efforts to prevent future incidents. Follow-up elopement risk assessments were completed as required by policy.

By the time of the December inspection, federal regulators determined the nursing home had achieved substantial compliance with elopement prevention requirements. The corrective actions implemented after both July and September incidents were confirmed as effective.

The inspection classified the violations as causing minimal harm with few residents affected. Both elopement incidents were considered past noncompliance, meaning the facility had corrected the deficient practices by the time of the federal review.

Neither resident suffered documented injuries during their unauthorized departures. The inspection report did not specify how long each resident remained outside the facility before being located and returned.

The badge-bypassed door sensors represented a critical failure in the facility's security system designed to protect vulnerable residents. Despite having policies, procedures, and identification materials in place, the technological safeguards proved ineffective when staff credentials could override them.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Avantara Norton from 2025-12-30 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

AVANTARA NORTON in SIOUX FALLS, SD was cited for violations during a health inspection on December 30, 2025.

The first elopement occurred July 26 when a resident left the facility around 7:30 p.m.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at AVANTARA NORTON?
The first elopement occurred July 26 when a resident left the facility around 7:30 p.m.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SIOUX FALLS, SD, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from AVANTARA NORTON or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 435039.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check AVANTARA NORTON's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.