Federal inspectors found the nursing home's elopement prevention policies "failed to define staff roles and required actions when a wander guard alarm activated, resulting in delayed response and resident elopement."

The December inspection focused on Resident #90, who had been identified as an elopement risk. The facility's care plan included specific interventions: allow wandering in safe areas within the facility, approach in a calm manner, check exit and door alarms routinely, and verify wander alarm placement every shift.
But when the resident's wander guard went off, staff didn't know what to do.
The facility's Wanderguards/Elopement Prevention Systems policy, dated February 2025, stated residents identified as exit-seeking "will have a wanderguard or similar device placed on their person, to assist in preventing them from wandering out of the facility and potentially being harmed." The policy required elopement risk to be documented on care plans "along with interventions, to include wanderguard."
What the policy didn't include was what happened next.
When inspectors interviewed Licensed Nurse #7 on December 28 at 6:38 PM, they asked if the facility had made any changes to Resident #90's care plan after the elopement. The nurse said they added a goal for the resident to notify staff when he or she would like to go to the store.
That was it.
Review of the resident's revised care plan, dated November 20, revealed the addition of exactly that goal: "resident will notify staff when [he/she] would like to go to the store." Inspectors found no other interventions were included to prevent future elopements.
The facility's original care plan for Resident #90 had been comprehensive on paper. It identified the problem as "elopement/exit seeking/wandering related to wanders aimlessly" and set clear goals: "Resident's safety will not be endangered related to behaviors. Will have reduced episodes of exit-seeking behaviors. Will not leave the facility without a responsible person. Will not wander out of the facility."
The interventions covered medication administration, safe wandering areas, calm approaches, routine alarm checks, wander alarm function checks per manufacturer recommendations, shift-by-shift alarm placement verification, physician notification if behaviors interfered with daily functioning, and elopement risk assessment per facility policy.
But none of that prevented the resident from walking out.
The facility's Elopement/Wandering policy, dated October 2025, required licensed nurses to complete specific tasks upon a resident's return: "Review and update care plan and in room care plan/Kardex - Update interventions."
The policy assumed residents would return. It didn't address what staff should do in real time when alarms sounded.
Federal inspectors determined this gap between policy and practice created the conditions for elopement. The wander guard system was in place, the resident was identified as at risk, and care plan interventions existed on paper. But when the technology designed to prevent elopement activated, staff response was delayed because no one had defined their roles.
The inspection classified this as a violation causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. But for Resident #90, the distinction between potential and actual harm came down to whether staff knew what to do when an alarm went off.
After the elopement, the facility's solution was to ask the resident to notify staff before wanting to go to the store. The underlying problem remained: policies that equipped staff with wander guards and care plans but left them without clear direction when those systems failed.
The December 24 inspection revealed a facility where safety technology existed alongside procedural gaps that made that technology less effective when residents needed protection most.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Centennial Post Acute from 2025-12-24 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.