Shell Lake Health Care Center: Abuse Reporting Failure - WI

That delay, and what the facility's administrator said about it afterward, are at the center of a December 2025 federal complaint inspection at Shell Lake Health Care Center.

On the night of August 23, 2025, the nursing assistant, identified in inspection records as CNA1, was working a shift alongside CNA2. At some point during the night, CNA1 heard a resident, identified as R1, shouting from behind a closed door while CNA2 was in the room providing care. She heard a thud. Later, while CNA2 was helping another resident, R2, get dressed, CNA1 overheard R2 say to CNA2: "quit being so rough."

CNA1 said later that there was nobody around at the end of her shift to report to. She went home. She did not come back to work until August 25. She reported her concerns that day, but only after talking with a coworker who pushed her to do it.

By then, CNA2 had already worked additional hours at the facility. According to time card records reviewed by inspectors, CNA2 worked from 9:53 p.m. to 2:43 a.m. on August 23, returned the same night from 3:18 a.m. to 6:47 a.m. on August 24, worked again that evening from 9:53 p.m. to 12:49 a.m., and was finally suspended on August 25 at 11:03 p.m., when the investigation began.

The facility investigated. It conducted body checks on all residents and found no unexplained injuries. Resident and staff interviews, according to the Director of Nursing, turned up no concerns about abuse or rough handling. The investigation did not substantiate that abuse had occurred. CNA2 was reinstated. CNA1 quit her job shortly after the incident and did not return.

What the inspection focused on was not whether abuse happened. It was whether the facility's own reporting system worked the way it was supposed to.

It didn't.

The facility's abuse prevention policy, dated December 2023, states that all employees are obligated to report immediately if they have reason to believe abuse has occurred, and that reports must go directly to the administrator, social worker, or director of nursing. The policy also requires the internal investigation to be completed within five working days.

CNA1 waited two days. That part is not disputed.

What the administrator said about it, during an interview with inspectors on December 23, drew the sharpest attention.

The administrator told inspectors that CNA1 had received abuse reporting training when she was hired and that all staff received additional training after this incident. She said CNA1 wasn't entirely sure whether what she'd witnessed counted as potential abuse, and that it took a conversation with a coworker before she decided to report. Then the administrator said this: "CNA1 failed to think it through and report as she should have. This is not a failure for the facility, but more a failure for her. I can't force people to think. We can offer training, educate, and give tools but can't make them think."

The Director of Nursing offered a more measured account. She told inspectors she expected staff to report any allegation immediately to a supervisor or to administration so the accused employee could be removed from the floor right away to prevent further potential harm. She said education was provided to all staff after the incident.

But the facility's reporting problems didn't end with CNA1's delay.

After the initial report was filed with the state, the facility was required to submit a follow-up investigation report within five days. The DON told inspectors she believed she had submitted it on time. When she checked the system again on September 8, 2025, she discovered the report had never actually gone through. She said it might have been a glitch in a new reporting system, or it might have been user error. Either way, the state did not receive the report when it was due.

The DON told inspectors this was the first follow-up investigation report she had submitted using the new system.

The inspection was classified as a complaint survey. The deficiency cited, F0609, covers the requirement that facilities report allegations of abuse to the state and to law enforcement. The level of harm was listed as minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting a small number of residents.

The facility did report the allegations to police and to the residents' physicians and representatives. That part of the process worked. The gap was in what happened in the hours between when CNA1 heard the shout and the thud and when anyone in a position of authority learned about it, and then again in the weeks between when the investigation concluded and when the state was supposed to receive the follow-up report.

Two residents were at the center of this. R1, who was heard shouting from behind a closed door while CNA2 was providing care. R2, who told CNA2 directly to stop being so rough while CNA2 was helping her get dressed. Neither resident, according to the inspection record, reported concerns during the facility's subsequent interviews. No injuries were found. The investigation was closed without a finding of abuse.

What the record cannot answer is what happened in those rooms. The inspection report does not say. CNA1 heard what she heard, and she went home, and she came back two days later, and by then CNA2 had worked at least three more shifts.

The administrator's position, stated plainly to federal inspectors, was that the facility did what it could. It trained CNA1. It provided tools. It cannot, she said, make people think.

R2 had already told someone to stop being rough with her. She said it out loud, in the room, to the person doing it. The only other person who heard her was CNA1, who went home without telling anyone for two days.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Shell Lake Health Care Center from 2025-12-23 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

• View all inspection reports for Shell Lake Health Care Center
• Browse all WI nursing home inspections