The November incident at Addison Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center involved Resident 73, who was found with his hand positioned inside Resident 36's brief through the leg opening while she sat in her wheelchair near the nurse's station.
CNA 399 discovered the two residents in the common area after finishing care with another patient. She saw Resident 36 seated in her wheelchair wearing two facility gowns - one open to the front underneath, another open to the back - along with an incontinence brief.
Resident 73 was kneeling beside the wheelchair.
"I was able to see the right side of Resident 36's brief and saw Resident 73's fingers inside the brief at Resident 36's peri area," CNA 399 told inspectors during a December telephone interview. "Resident 73's hand was coming in from the side of the brief, not down from the top."
The nursing assistant described the brief as "scrunched to the side" and said Resident 36's head was tilted back "in a position that made it appear she enjoyed the interaction."
CNA 399 explained that based on the placement and depth of Resident 73's fingers inside the brief, she could tell he was touching Resident 36's intimate area.
Only three staff members were working the hall when the incident occurred: the medication-passing nurse and another nursing assistant who was in a different resident's room, along with CNA 399.
After witnessing the incident, CNA 399 reported her observations to the Director of Nursing, who arrived at the facility after the event occurred. The DON instructed her to keep her written statement about the incident brief.
The facility launched an investigation, but the administrator reached a different conclusion than the eyewitness account.
During a December interview with inspectors, the administrator said he was familiar with the incident report and recalled that the investigation found "Resident 73's hand was inside Resident 36's brief, along the hip."
However, the administrator stated he "did not agree sexual abuse occurred to Resident 36."
He characterized the facility's investigation as thorough and maintained that it revealed Resident 73's hand was merely "on the side of Resident 36's brief" rather than inside it.
The administrator noted what he called a discrepancy between CNA 399's written statement immediately after the incident and her later detailed telephone interview with the state surveyor. He argued that the written statement "did not indicate sexual abuse."
LPN 400 documented being notified that Resident 73 was "trying to touch Resident 36" and observed that "the side of Resident 36's brief was pulled out."
The facility's own policy on residents' rights to freedom from abuse, neglect and exploitation specifically addresses this type of situation. The 2025 policy states that staff "shall review altercations from resident to resident as a potential situation for abuse."
The policy also requires staff to monitor for behaviors that may provoke reactions, including "sexually aggressive behavior such as saying sexual things, inappropriate touching/grabbing."
Despite having this policy framework and an eyewitness account from a nursing assistant who described seeing one resident's fingers positioned inside another resident's incontinence brief at an intimate area, facility leadership concluded no sexual abuse occurred.
The incident represents a complex intersection of resident rights, staff observations, and administrative interpretation. CNA 399 provided specific details about hand placement, brief positioning, and the residents' physical arrangement that she witnessed firsthand.
Her account described not just casual contact but deliberate positioning - Resident 73 kneeling beside the wheelchair, his hand entering through the leg opening of the brief rather than from above, fingers positioned at the intimate area with sufficient depth that she could determine he was touching Resident 36's peri area.
The nursing assistant also noted Resident 36's apparent physical response, with her head tilted back in what appeared to be enjoyment of the interaction.
Yet facility administration viewed the same evidence and reached an opposite conclusion, focusing on the location of the hand contact rather than the nature and intent of the touching.
The disagreement highlights ongoing challenges in nursing home sexual abuse investigations, where staff witness accounts may conflict with administrative interpretations of the same events.
The incident occurred in a high-visibility area near the nurse's station during regular care hours, suggesting that more serious violations could occur in less supervised locations or times.
Federal inspectors cited the facility for failing to protect residents from abuse, noting that the deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under two separate complaint numbers.
The citation carries minimal harm designation, affecting few residents, but underscores the facility's failure to properly address what a frontline caregiver characterized as inappropriate sexual contact between vulnerable residents.
CNA 399's detailed observations - from the specific method of hand entry through the brief's leg opening to the depth of finger placement - paint a picture of deliberate intimate contact that the facility's investigation apparently minimized or dismissed.
The case raises questions about how nursing homes investigate resident-to-resident incidents and whether administrative conclusions adequately reflect staff observations of potentially abusive behavior.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Addison Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center from 2025-12-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Addison Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center
- Browse all OH nursing home inspections