The December incident at Ansley Cove Healthcare and Rehabilitation revealed a cascade of failures that left an elderly woman dead and undetected for hours. Federal inspectors found the facility violated basic care standards, earning an immediate jeopardy citation for putting residents at risk.
Resident #2 required extensive care because she could not move on her own and was mostly non-verbal. She needed regular monitoring and repositioning to prevent complications. The facility's own policy required dependent residents to be checked approximately every two hours.
But on the night she died, no one had seen her for hours.
LPN E discovered the resident unresponsive sometime before 11:45 PM. The licensed practical nurse immediately recognized signs that should have stopped any resuscitation attempt. The resident was in rigor mortis, a stiffening of muscles that occurs hours after death.
Despite this obvious sign of clinical death, staff initiated CPR anyway.
LPN A was at the medication cart when she heard LPN E inform RN B that resident #2 was deceased. She watched the chaos that followed unfold in real time.
CNA C started yelling when questioned about when she had last seen the resident. The certified nursing assistant claimed she hadn't taken care of resident #2 because she thought the resident was in the hospital.
LPN E told colleagues that resident #2 was already in rigor mortis when found, meaning "it must have been a few hours since she passed." Yet LPN E still assisted RN B with running the code, calling the Director of Nursing, and placing the crash cart in the resident's room before EMS arrived.
LPN A observed RN B performing CPR on resident #2 "even though she was already deceased."
When emergency medical services arrived, they confirmed what staff should have recognized immediately. The resident's core body temperature measured 90.7 degrees Fahrenheit, far below normal body temperature and consistent with death that had occurred hours earlier.
EMS left equipment behind and had to return to retrieve it. During that second visit, they shared the temperature reading with facility staff, providing definitive proof that the resident "had been deceased for a long time."
The resident's granddaughter, who held power of attorney, learned of her grandmother's death from the hospital after 1:00 AM. The emergency room physician delivered devastating news: resident #2 had no pulse during transport, her body was cold, and she had "most likely been deceased for some time."
A family member had visited with resident #2 earlier that day and noticed she appeared anxious and confused. The granddaughter knew her grandmother needed constant care due to her inability to move independently and limited verbal communication.
She believed the facility had neglected to provide necessary care and "were not forthcoming about her death."
The facility's response raised additional concerns about transparency and accountability.
Director of Nursing, who also served as the Abuse Coordinator, claimed she received a call from RN B at approximately 12:30 AM reporting that resident #2 was found unresponsive and CPR was initiated. She said she instructed RN B to collect witness statements from staff involved.
The DON denied knowing resident #2 had already died when she received the call. She maintained she did not instruct staff to perform CPR on an already deceased resident.
Both the DON and Nursing Home Administrator denied knowing that resident #2 had passed prior to being discovered by staff. They claimed ignorance about the resident arriving at the hospital in rigor mortis with a body temperature of 90.7 degrees Fahrenheit.
The medical director, contacted the following day, said he learned about the incident after reviewing hospital records. He shared his findings with facility leadership but indicated the facility was conducting its own internal investigation.
LPN A revealed she was never asked to write a witness statement by either the DON or the Nursing Home Administrator, despite being present during the entire incident.
The facility's own policies contradicted the actions taken that night.
CPR policy revised earlier that year explicitly stated staff should not perform CPR if the resident showed "obvious signs of clinical death including rigor mortis." Staff violated their own written procedures by attempting resuscitation on a resident who clearly met this criteria.
The facility's abuse and neglect policy defined neglect as "the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress."
Possible indicators of neglect included "failure to provide care needs such as comfort, safety, feeding, bathing, dressing, and turning/repositioning."
The medical director acknowledged that dependent residents were expected to be checked approximately every two hours. This standard monitoring could have prevented the prolonged period between death and discovery.
Federal inspectors determined the incident represented immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety, the most serious level of violation. The citation indicates inspectors found the facility's failures put other residents at continued risk of harm.
The case highlights systemic problems with resident monitoring, staff accountability, and emergency response procedures. A vulnerable resident who required constant care died alone and remained undiscovered for hours while staff assumed she was elsewhere.
The granddaughter's concerns about the facility being less than forthcoming proved prescient. Multiple staff members witnessed clear signs of prolonged death, yet facility leadership claimed ignorance about the circumstances surrounding the resident's passing.
The resident's final day was marked by anxiety and confusion, according to family who visited. Her death went unnoticed for hours in a facility charged with providing round-the-clock care to vulnerable elderly residents who cannot advocate for themselves.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Ansley Cove Healthcare and Rehabilitation from 2025-12-19 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Ansley Cove Healthcare and Rehabilitation
- Browse all FL nursing home inspections