Creekside Village: Hygiene Care Failures Found - TX
The inspection, completed December 1, 2025, was triggered by a complaint. Inspectors cited the facility under F0677, which covers basic personal hygiene and grooming. The level of harm was recorded as minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting a few residents.
CNA B, as she is identified in the inspection report, told inspectors she had worked at the facility full time since July 2025, covering the 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. shift. She was assigned to Resident 1. She said the last time she provided incontinent care for that resident was somewhere between 7:30 and 7:45 in the morning. Then she missed the next round.
She knew what the schedule was supposed to be. She told inspectors herself: incontinent care should be provided at least every two hours.
The facility's own written policy on perineal care, dated February 2018, spells out the procedure in detail. For female residents, the policy instructs staff to wash the perineal area front to back, separate the labia, wash downward from front to back, continue moving from inside outward to the thigh, rinse thoroughly using fresh water and a clean washcloth, then rinse and dry thoroughly. The purpose of the policy, as written, is to provide cleanliness and comfort, prevent infection, and prevent skin irritation.
None of that happened during the missed round.
The gap between 7:30 or 7:45 in the morning and whenever the next care was eventually provided is not specified in the inspection record. What is specified is that CNA B acknowledged the round did not happen. There is no indication in the report that anyone else stepped in to cover it.
Incontinent care is not a comfort measure in the way that a warm blanket or a conversation might be. Prolonged skin contact with urine and fecal matter breaks down tissue. It causes irritation that can progress to open wounds. For residents who cannot reposition themselves or communicate distress, the consequences of a missed round are not abstract. They accumulate quietly, in the skin, before anyone notices.
CNA B did not dispute what happened. She stated it plainly: she missed the round.
The inspection report does not describe what condition Resident 1 was found in, or whether any skin breakdown had already occurred by the time inspectors arrived. It does not say whether a supervisor was notified, or whether the missed round was documented anywhere in the resident's record. What it says is that the care did not happen when it was supposed to happen, and that the person responsible acknowledged it.
Creekside Village is located at 914 N. Brazosport Blvd. in Richwood, a small city south of Houston in Brazoria County.
The facility's plan of correction is not included in the publicly available inspection document. For information on how Creekside Village intends to address the deficiency, the state survey agency directed inquiries to the nursing home directly.
Resident 1 was left waiting.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Creekside Village from 2025-12-01 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: August 21, 2026 · Our methodology
CREEKSIDE VILLAGE in RICHWOOD, TX was cited for violations during a health inspection on December 1, 2025.
The inspection, completed December 1, 2025, was triggered by a complaint.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.