The window in Resident #3's room had multiple cracks covered with green tape, but also contained "a broken, open area with no coverage," according to federal inspectors who visited the facility on October 14. The window was open during their visit.
The maintenance director told inspectors he started working at the facility on September 15 and the window was already broken then. He said he was aware of the broken window and had already purchased materials to repair it, stating it would be fixed that day.
When asked about the risks, the maintenance director said residents "could cut themselves on it."
Resident #3 told inspectors she didn't realize the window was that bad and wasn't sure how long it had been broken. She said she hoped maintenance would repair the window soon and that it would be fixed the same day as the inspection.
The administrator identified additional concerns beyond injury risk. During an interview, the administrator said the broken window posed "pest control concerns" for the facility.
The broken window violation occurred alongside housekeeping problems affecting another resident's family. A family member of Resident #2 told inspectors they had complained to the facility twice about his room not being cleaned properly.
The family member said the cleaning issues happened mostly on weekends, when facility staff told them there were fewer housekeepers working. They said they wanted Resident #2's room to be cleaned more consistently.
These maintenance and housekeeping failures violated the facility's own resident rights policy. The policy, dated August 2020, states that all residents have "a right to a dignified existence" and that the facility "must treat each resident with respect and dignity."
The policy specifically requires the facility to "care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality."
Federal inspectors found the facility failed to provide equal access to quality care regardless of payment source, as promised in its written policies.
The broken window represented a basic environmental safety failure. With cracks covered only partially by tape and an open broken area, the window created multiple hazards for an elderly resident who may have limited mobility or awareness of the danger.
The maintenance director's acknowledgment that he had already purchased repair materials but delayed the work for weeks raises questions about the facility's prioritization of resident safety. Having the materials available but leaving a known hazard unaddressed contradicts standard maintenance protocols for healthcare facilities.
The timing of the maintenance director's employment also highlights systemic issues. He discovered the broken window on his first day in September but allowed it to remain unrepaired through October, suggesting either inadequate training on safety priorities or insufficient oversight from facility administration.
Resident #3's uncertainty about how long the window had been broken indicates the problem may have existed even longer than the maintenance director's two-month tenure. Her lack of awareness about the severity of the damage also suggests potential communication failures between residents and staff about safety concerns.
The administrator's focus on pest control, while the maintenance director emphasized cut risks, reveals inconsistent hazard assessment among facility leadership. Both risks were valid, but the lack of coordinated response allowed the danger to persist.
Weekend housekeeping shortages affecting Resident #2's family demonstrate broader staffing challenges that impact basic care quality. When families must make repeated complaints about room cleaning, it suggests inadequate supervision of housekeeping operations and insufficient weekend coverage.
The facility's resident rights policy promises to "protect and promote the rights of the resident" and ensure care "in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of quality of life." A broken window with exposed glass and inadequate weekend housekeeping directly contradict these commitments.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain safe physical environments for all residents. The combination of delayed window repairs and inconsistent room cleaning indicates systemic maintenance deficiencies that could affect resident safety and dignity.
Resident #3 remained in her room with the broken window throughout the inspection period, hoping for same-day repairs that the maintenance director had the materials to complete but had postponed for weeks.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Ft Worth Southwest Nursing Center from 2025-11-26 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Ft Worth Southwest Nursing Center
- Browse all TX nursing home inspections