Skip to main content
Advertisement

Folsom Care Center: Resident Groped by Known Wanderer - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The incident occurred at Folsom Care Center, where Resident 1 has lived since 2020 with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury and dementia. His care plan, initiated July 8, 2024, specifically noted that he "has a behavior problem entering personal space of others making them feel uncomfortable."

Folsom Care Center facility inspection

A housekeeper witnessed the touching incident involving Resident 2, who has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and severely impaired cognitive function. During a September 8 progress note at 1:13 p.m., Resident 2 admitted that Resident 1 had touched her vagina.

Advertisement

Federal inspectors found that facility staff knew about Resident 1's pattern of inappropriate behavior but failed to monitor him closely enough to prevent the sexual contact.

Resident 1's assessment scores revealed mixed cognitive abilities. His Brief Interview for Mental Status showed a score of 12 out of 15, indicating "some understanding." However, his behavioral assessment documented previous incidents of "physical behavior symptoms directed at others," including hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, and sexually abusing others.

The victim, Resident 2, scored just 4 out of 15 on her cognitive assessment, indicating she "did not have full understanding." She was admitted to the facility in 2024 with breathing difficulties from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

During interviews with inspectors on September 24, the Director of Nursing acknowledged the facility's failure. "Resident 1 was witnessed by a staff member touching Resident 2 on the groin," the director stated. "Resident 1 has a history of going into other resident's personal space and inappropriate touching."

The housekeeper confirmed witnessing the groping incident during their interview the same day at 11:13 a.m.

When pressed about the facility's supervision failures, the Director of Nursing admitted responsibility. "This shouldn't have occurred, and he should have been watched more closely," the director said during a follow-up interview at 12:43 p.m. "He should have been monitored more closely since it has occurred before."

The incident represents a violation of the facility's own resident rights policy, dated April 2017, which guarantees residents the right "to be free from mental and physical abuse."

Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain environments free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent harm. The inspection found that Folsom Care Center failed both requirements when it allowed a resident with known inappropriate touching behaviors to access and sexually assault a cognitively impaired woman.

The facility's care planning process had identified Resident 1's problematic behavior more than a year before the groping incident. His July 2024 care plan documented his tendency to enter other residents' personal space and make them uncomfortable. Yet staff supervision remained inadequate to prevent him from sexually touching Resident 2.

Resident 1's traumatic brain injury, sustained before his 2020 admission, likely contributed to his behavioral problems. Brain injuries can affect impulse control, social awareness, and appropriate boundary recognition. However, the facility's awareness of these risks made their supervision failure more significant.

The cognitive assessments painted a clear picture of vulnerability. While Resident 1 retained some mental capacity with his score of 12 out of 15, Resident 2's score of 4 indicated severe cognitive impairment. This disparity made adequate supervision even more critical to protect the more vulnerable resident.

The September incident was not an isolated event. Resident 1's behavioral assessment specifically documented previous episodes of physical aggression and sexual abuse directed at other residents. The facility's own records showed a pattern of inappropriate touching that staff had failed to adequately address through supervision or intervention.

Staff members were aware of the ongoing risk. The Director of Nursing's acknowledgment that "it has occurred before" confirmed that facility leadership knew about Resident 1's history of inappropriate sexual contact with other residents. Despite this knowledge, they failed to implement sufficient safeguards.

The housekeeper's direct observation of the groping incident highlighted the failure of staff supervision. While a housekeeper happened to witness the assault, the absence of adequate nursing supervision allowed the incident to occur in the first place.

Federal inspectors classified the violation as having "minimal harm or potential for actual harm" affecting "few" residents. However, the sexual assault had clear potential to cause both physical and emotional distress to Resident 2, who lacked the cognitive capacity to protect herself or fully understand what had happened.

The facility's resident rights policy explicitly promised protection from mental and physical abuse. The September groping incident violated this fundamental guarantee, demonstrating that policy statements mean little without adequate staffing and supervision to enforce them.

Folsom Care Center's failure occurred despite multiple warning signs and documentation systems designed to prevent exactly this type of incident. The facility had assessment tools identifying both residents' vulnerabilities, care plans documenting problematic behaviors, and policies protecting resident rights.

The Director of Nursing's admission that closer monitoring was needed revealed the facility's understanding of what proper care required. "He should have been watched more closely" acknowledged that adequate supervision could have prevented the sexual assault.

The incident exposed broader questions about how nursing homes manage residents with behavioral problems stemming from brain injuries. Facilities must balance residents' freedom of movement with other residents' safety, particularly when cognitive impairments affect both the aggressor's impulse control and the victim's ability to protect herself.

Resident 2 remains at the facility where she was sexually assaulted, her severe cognitive impairment leaving her dependent on the same staff who failed to protect her from a resident they knew posed risks to others.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Folsom Care Center from 2025-11-25 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

FOLSOM CARE CENTER in FOLSOM, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 25, 2025.

The incident occurred at Folsom Care Center, where Resident 1 has lived since 2020 with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury and dementia.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at FOLSOM CARE CENTER?
The incident occurred at Folsom Care Center, where Resident 1 has lived since 2020 with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury and dementia.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in FOLSOM, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from FOLSOM CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 055173.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check FOLSOM CARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.