The resident, identified as R5 in inspection records, was under enhanced barrier precautions specifically designed to prevent transmission of drug-resistant organisms. But when federal inspectors observed the November 10 wound care session, they found multiple protocol violations that could have exposed other residents to dangerous infections.
RN-A, the nurse providing care, told inspectors he was completely unaware R5 required enhanced barrier precautions. He acknowledged the importance of these protocols in preventing infection spread but admitted he never checked the resident's care plan before beginning treatment.
The facility uses purple stars posted near resident doors to alert staff when enhanced precautions are required. R5's room had no such marking.
During the wound care procedure, RN-A removed his gloves but failed to sanitize his hands before putting on new ones. When questioned by inspectors, he acknowledged this violated proper protocol but said no hand sanitizer was available in R5's room.
"He should have sanitized hands between glove use," RN-A told inspectors, according to the federal report.
The director of nursing discovered the missing safety protocols during the inspection itself. At 12:45 p.m., she was overheard in the hallway telling a nursing assistant to "remember purple stars means gowns." Seventeen minutes later, she applied a purple star to R5's nameplate and moved personal protective equipment from the end of the hall to outside the resident's door.
The timing revealed how long R5 had been without proper infection control signage. The director confirmed to inspectors that R5 required enhanced barrier precautions for wound care but had no purple star posted until she added one that afternoon. She spent the day applying purple stars and positioning protective equipment outside other residents' rooms who were also missing the required markings.
Enhanced barrier precautions require staff to wear gowns and gloves during personal care and wound treatment for residents at high risk of carrying drug-resistant organisms. The facility's own policy mandates that protective equipment be "available immediately near or outside a resident's room" and that alcohol-based hand sanitizer be placed "in every resident room, ideally both inside and outside."
The policy also requires staff to perform hand hygiene "immediately after removing gloves" to prevent spreading infections to other residents and staff members.
For wound care specifically, facility policy outlines a detailed process: wash hands, put on gloves, remove soiled dressing, remove gloves, wash hands, put on clean gloves, clean and measure the wound, remove gloves, wash hands, put on new gloves, apply treatments and secure new dressing, then dispose of gloves and wash hands again.
RN-A followed none of these hand hygiene steps during R5's care.
The violations occurred despite the facility having clear written policies for infection control. The Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy states the facility has discretion in how to communicate which residents require special precautions, "as long as staff were aware of which residents required the use of EBP prior to providing high-contact care activities."
But the communication system failed completely. RN-A told inspectors he typically learned about enhanced precautions through shift reports and care plan reviews. He received neither notification method for R5.
The resident's electronic medical records and care plan both clearly identified the enhanced barrier precaution requirement. The orders were documented and available to nursing staff, but RN-A never accessed them before beginning wound treatment.
Federal inspectors classified the violations as causing minimal harm with potential for actual harm to a few residents. However, the breakdown in infection control protocols could have exposed multiple residents and staff members to drug-resistant organisms during the period when proper precautions were not followed.
The facility's own policies acknowledge that enhanced barrier precautions exist specifically "for the prevention of transmission of multidrug resistant organisms" among vulnerable nursing home populations. When those protocols fail, residents face increased risks of acquiring infections that are difficult or impossible to treat with standard antibiotics.
R5 continued to require wound care and enhanced barrier precautions following the inspection, but now with proper signage and protective equipment positioned outside the door.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Minnewaska Community Health Services from 2025-11-24 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Minnewaska Community Health Services
- Browse all MN nursing home inspections