Skip to main content
Advertisement

Courtyard Health Care: Choking Risk Diet Failure - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The September incident at Courtyard Health Care Center involved a woman admitted in October 2024 with moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, and adult failure to thrive. Her care plan specifically noted swallowing problems and nutritional risks related to being underweight.

Courtyard Health Care Center facility inspection

Federal inspectors observed the resident's lunch tray on September 29 at 1:20 pm during the B-unit meal service. The tray contained a burger bun with a large, breaded piece of chicken, tomato slice, lettuce, macaroni salad, juice, and pudding.

Advertisement

Ten minutes later, the resident explained why she hadn't touched her food. She could not chew the chicken burger because her upper teeth were broken, making it impossible to bite the meat. The chicken was too hard and chewy for her to manage.

"The chicken meat was not tender enough to bite for her, and the meat was hard and chewy," according to the inspection report.

Her therapeutic diet plan from September 3 specified she should receive a "regular diet easy to chew level 7 texture." This wasn't a minor dietary preference. The resident's September 23 care plan documented her swallowing problem and potential nutritional risk related to underweight, protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, and adult failure to thrive.

The facility's own policy for Level 7 Regular Easy to Chew diets, dated January 2019, explicitly prohibits foods that are "hard, tough, chewy, fibrous, have stringy textures." The policy requires meat to be "cooked until tender," and if staff cannot serve soft and tender meat, they must serve it "Minced and Moist."

The large, breaded chicken piece violated every aspect of these requirements.

The Dietary Manager acknowledged the serious implications during an interview that afternoon. If a therapeutic diet plan wasn't followed correctly, the resident might not eat enough, potentially causing inadequate nutrition. More immediately dangerous, if the resident couldn't chew the food properly, it created a possible choking risk.

This wasn't a resident who could advocate effectively for different food or work around the problem. Her cognitive assessment showed intact mental status with a perfect score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status. She understood exactly what was happening when she received food she couldn't eat.

The violation occurred despite multiple warning signs in her medical record. Her admission diagnoses painted a picture of someone already struggling nutritionally. Moderate protein-calorie malnutrition means the body isn't getting enough protein to function properly. Adult failure to thrive indicates significant decline in weight, muscle mass, and overall health.

For someone in this condition, missing meals isn't just inconvenient. It accelerates the decline the care plan was designed to prevent.

The resident's broken upper teeth weren't a new development that caught staff off guard. Her swallowing difficulties were documented. Her need for easy-to-chew foods was established in writing. The kitchen had clear policies about what constituted appropriate texture modifications.

Yet when lunch arrived, none of that mattered. She received the same hard, breaded chicken burger that would challenge someone with perfect teeth and no swallowing problems.

The inspection found this failure had "the potential to negatively impact Resident 2's nutritional status." For someone already dealing with malnutrition and failure to thrive, that potential impact could accelerate a dangerous decline.

The facility policy acknowledged the stakes. Easy-to-chew diets exist because some residents cannot safely manage regular textures. The policy's specificity about avoiding hard, tough, and chewy foods reflects understanding that the wrong texture can mean the difference between adequate nutrition and going hungry.

On September 29, that understanding failed. A resident who needed careful nutritional support received food she couldn't eat and went without lunch because her broken teeth couldn't handle what the kitchen served.

The woman sat with her full tray, unable to eat, while staff moved on to serve other residents. Her intact cognition meant she fully understood she was going hungry because someone hadn't followed the diet plan designed to keep her safe.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Courtyard Health Care Center from 2025-11-24 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

COURTYARD HEALTH CARE CENTER in DAVIS, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 24, 2025.

Her care plan specifically noted swallowing problems and nutritional risks related to being underweight.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at COURTYARD HEALTH CARE CENTER?
Her care plan specifically noted swallowing problems and nutritional risks related to being underweight.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in DAVIS, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from COURTYARD HEALTH CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 055922.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check COURTYARD HEALTH CARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.