Skip to main content
Advertisement

Kyakameena Care Center: Elopement Safety Failures - CA

Healthcare Facility:

Resident 29 had eloped on more than one occasion, according to the Director of Nursing, who told federal inspectors during a November complaint investigation that she wasn't aware the resident's elopement risk had never been addressed in his care plan. She was hired after his admission to the facility.

Kyakameena Care Center facility inspection

The facility's intervention consisted of monitoring his location and providing a wander guard. But Resident 29 continued to elope because he removed the tracking device.

Advertisement

Despite the repeated escapes, the interdisciplinary team had never met to review the episodes. The Director of Nursing could not provide inspectors with a comprehensive care plan that addressed the resident's wandering and elopement risk or documented appropriate interventions for each incident.

The facility's own policy, dating to 2001, requires reporting unusual occurrences that affect resident health, safety or welfare to appropriate agencies within 24 hours. The policy specifically addresses wandering and elopements, stating the facility will identify at-risk residents and prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment.

Federal inspectors reviewed Resident 29's admission assessment, nursing notes and progress records during the investigation. The inspection was triggered by a complaint filed against the Berkeley facility.

Kyakameena Care Center's failure to develop and implement an adequate care plan for a resident with documented elopement history represents a breakdown in basic safety protocols. Each escape incident should have prompted a care plan review and intervention adjustment.

The Director of Nursing's admission that she was unaware of the resident's elopement risk highlights communication gaps between administrative staff and direct care providers. Federal regulations require nursing homes to assess each resident's individual needs and develop comprehensive care plans to address identified risks.

Wander guards are electronic monitoring devices designed to alert staff when residents with dementia or cognitive impairment attempt to leave secured areas. When residents repeatedly defeat these safety measures, facilities must implement additional interventions and modify care approaches.

The interdisciplinary team typically includes nurses, social workers, therapists, dietary staff and physicians who meet regularly to review resident care plans and address emerging issues. The team's failure to convene after multiple elopement incidents left Resident 29 without updated safety measures.

Elopement poses serious risks to nursing home residents, particularly those with dementia who may become lost, injured or exposed to weather conditions. Facilities must balance safety concerns with residents' rights to move freely within their living environment.

The 2001 policy dates suggest Kyakameena Care Center has long-established protocols for handling wandering residents. However, having policies means nothing without proper implementation and staff training on current procedures.

Federal inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting some residents. The finding indicates the facility's elopement prevention measures fell short of federal standards for resident safety and care planning.

The inspection report does not detail how many times Resident 29 escaped or whether he was injured during any incidents. It also doesn't specify what type of cognitive impairment or medical condition contributed to his wandering behavior.

Nursing homes must conduct comprehensive assessments within 14 days of admission and develop individualized care plans addressing each resident's medical, nursing, social and psychological needs. Care plans require regular updates when residents' conditions change or new risks emerge.

The Director of Nursing's lack of awareness about a resident's documented safety risk raises questions about information transfer between administrative staff and continuity of care when leadership changes occur.

Kyakameena Care Center's inability to prevent repeated elopements despite knowing the resident's history demonstrates the facility's failure to protect vulnerable residents from foreseeable harm.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Kyakameena Care Center from 2025-11-21 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 23, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

KYAKAMEENA CARE CENTER in BERKELEY, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 21, 2025.

She was hired after his admission to the facility.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at KYAKAMEENA CARE CENTER?
She was hired after his admission to the facility.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in BERKELEY, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from KYAKAMEENA CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 055715.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check KYAKAMEENA CARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.