The November 11 assault occurred when a certified nursing assistant discovered Resident #10 in Resident #11's room with her hand on his penis, stroking up and down. The victim had asked her to stop, but she continued until staff entered the room.
Resident #11 told inspectors he was disturbed by the assault because he was asleep and was awakened by her touching him inappropriately.
The incident exposed a breakdown in supervision protocols for residents housed in the facility's Memory Support Unit, a locked ward for patients with dementia and behavioral issues. Resident #10 was classified as an elopement risk with aggressive behaviors who required constant supervision.
During the 8:30 p.m. smoking break, Resident #10 told Laundry Assistant #112 she was cold and wanted to wait inside the activity room near the smoke door until the break ended. The staff member agreed and allowed her to go inside alone.
When the smoking break concluded, Resident #10 was not in the activity room. Staff assumed she had returned to the Memory Support Unit on her own. Instead, she had entered Resident #11's room and assaulted him.
Assistant Director of Nursing #102 acknowledged that Resident #10 lived in the locked Memory Support Unit and confirmed the incident occurred during the smoke break. The administrator explained that when Resident #10 said she was cold, "staff permitted her to go back into the facility unsupervised, which allowed her the opportunity to enter Resident #11's room."
CNA #103 discovered the assault when he observed Resident #10 touching Resident #11's penis, with the act reflected in a window. The staff member immediately separated the residents, and Resident #10 was placed on one-on-one supervision.
The facility's own policies required Memory Support Unit residents to be observed at all times while outside the locked ward. Laundry Assistant #108 confirmed there were two residents on the unit who smoked and that "residents were to be observed at all times while they are out of the unit."
Both the Director of Nursing and Administrator verified it was the expectation that staff assigned to smoke breaks observe Memory Support Unit residents at all times until they were returned and secured back inside the unit.
Police were notified the following day and filed a report. The Administrator told inspectors that Resident #11 stated he did not wish to file charges, but police chose to proceed anyway. The case remains open.
Following the assault, both residents received psychiatric evaluations from an outside company. During a telehealth appointment on November 12, Resident #10 agreed not to touch another resident inappropriately and accepted continued monitoring.
A November 21 psychiatric evaluation revealed Resident #10 claimed she and Resident #11 had been in a relationship. She told the psychiatrist that if he didn't want to date anymore, she would not bother him. She agreed not to touch Resident #11 if he did not want to be touched.
The psychiatric notes documented that staff had reported Resident #10 touched Resident #11 inappropriately and that he did not want it to occur.
Social Worker #110 learned of the incident during a morning meeting on November 12. She spoke to both residents and arranged the telehealth appointments with the psychiatric company. The social worker denied knowledge of any previous incidents of sexual behavior by Resident #10 toward other residents at the facility.
Resident #10 was discharged on November 12 to Behavioral Hospital #3, one day after the assault.
The inspection found the facility failed to protect residents from abuse and ensure adequate supervision of those with known behavioral risks. Federal regulations require nursing homes to protect residents from abuse and provide appropriate supervision based on their assessed needs.
The violation represents what inspectors classified as minimal harm or potential for actual harm affecting few residents. However, the incident highlighted systemic failures in supervising vulnerable residents with documented behavioral issues and elopement risks.
The facility's abuse investigation and reporting policy, dated November 21, documented that residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation. The policy existed, but supervision protocols failed when staff allowed an unsupervised resident with known risks to access other areas of the facility.
The case illustrates the challenges nursing homes face in balancing resident freedoms, such as smoking breaks, with safety requirements for those with cognitive impairments and behavioral issues. Memory Support Units are designed as locked environments specifically to prevent residents with dementia from wandering and potentially harming themselves or others.
The assault occurred despite multiple safeguards that should have prevented it: the resident lived in a locked unit, was classified as an elopement risk with aggressive behaviors, and facility policy required constant supervision during activities outside the unit.
Instead, a single staff decision to allow an unsupervised return from a smoke break created the opportunity for sexual assault. The victim, who had been sleeping peacefully in his room, was awakened by unwanted sexual contact that continued even after he asked it to stop.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Wright Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from 2025-11-19 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Wright Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
- Browse all OH nursing home inspections