Staff B had been employed for only one month when administrators assigned her to train Staff A for dementia care. Neither assistant had prior experience working with dementia patients. Both were still completing their required training modules, with completion rates between 80 and 90 percent for dementia-specific coursework.
The staffing shortage became critical on October 29 when Staff A worked as the sole nursing assistant in the dementia unit during a resident fall. Federal inspectors found this violated the facility's own policy requiring two certified staff members during day and evening shifts.
Staff F, a nursing assistant, told inspectors she was concerned about inexperienced workers handling entire halls by themselves. She said more experienced staff should be assigned to those areas, noting the pattern of new employees training other new employees without adequate supervision.
The administrator was unaware that Staff A had been working alone in the dementia unit not only during the October 29 fall, but also when other staff arrived late for shifts and during break times on multiple occasions. She told inspectors that dementia training must be completed before staff could work in the specialized unit.
Staff Q, a registered nurse, had already raised concerns with the administrator about guidance and training issues. She reported that the entire second shift consisted of new employees and that falls had increased. The charge nurse was responsible for signing off on staff training while simultaneously providing care for 50 residents, leaving no time for follow-up supervision.
The census had dropped in the main facility areas, but the dementia unit maintained full capacity. This created additional pressure on the limited number of trained staff available for specialized care.
Inspectors discovered that Resident #1's behavior interventions had proven ineffective during care, but the clinical coordinator responsible for monitoring documentation effectiveness was unaware of the ongoing problems. The administrator also had no knowledge that the resident's interventions were failing.
Highland Ridge's facility assessment claimed staffing levels were regularly evaluated to determine capacity for new admissions. The document stated that admissions could be held based on inadequate staff levels or insufficient training for specific care needs. It emphasized that staff should not perform tasks they felt incompetent to handle.
The assessment outlined an acuity management system based on census reports, activities of daily living requirements, and historical trends. It specified that staffing would be prioritized for residents with higher care needs. The quality assurance committee had reviewed this assessment in April.
When confronted with the violations, the administrator acknowledged the facility lacked a specific written staffing policy for the dementia unit. In an email to inspectors, she wrote that their approach was "guided by resident-centered care principles and regulatory requirements" and that they "continuously evaluate staffing levels and make adjustments as needed."
The administrator committed to meeting or exceeding all state and federal staffing requirements, but inspectors had documented clear evidence that the facility's actual practices fell short of both its own policies and regulatory standards.
Staff F's concerns about inexperienced workers proved prescient. The pattern of new employees training other new employees, combined with solo shifts in a specialized care unit, created conditions that compromised resident safety. The October 29 fall occurred precisely when the facility's staffing policy was violated.
The training documents revealed the scope of the problem. Both Staff A and Staff B were working in the dementia unit while still completing basic certification requirements. Their incomplete training status meant they were providing specialized care without full preparation for the complex behavioral and medical needs of dementia patients.
Staff Q's observation about increased falls coinciding with an entirely new second shift highlighted the systemic nature of the staffing crisis. The facility had effectively replaced experienced workers with trainees across an entire shift, leaving no institutional knowledge or mentorship available during critical evening hours.
The administrator's lack of awareness about multiple policy violations suggested inadequate oversight systems. She remained uninformed about solo shifts, ineffective resident interventions, and the extent of training deficiencies until federal inspectors documented the problems.
Highland Ridge's written policies appeared comprehensive on paper, but the reality of daily operations told a different story. The gap between documented procedures and actual practice left vulnerable dementia patients in the care of undertrained staff working without adequate supervision or support.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC from 2025-11-19 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Highland Ridge Care Center, LLC
- Browse all IA nursing home inspections