The incident began when LVN A attempted to insert an indwelling catheter for Resident #1 on October 12, 2025. The procedure proved difficult, and a certified nursing assistant later reported finding blood evidence in the resident's adult brief.
LVN B, who worked the 6 AM to 6 PM shift, received a report about the complications from LVN A that morning. "LVN A had a difficult procedure of instilling an indwelling foley catheter for Resident #1 and had received a report from a CNA that Resident #1 had bleeding evidence in his adult brief," LVN B told inspectors during a November 4 interview.
The two nurses assessed the resident together and discovered no urine flow from the catheter. LVN B attempted to insert a fresh catheter but encountered the same problem.
"LVN B stated she could not overcome Resident #1's enlarged prostate to reach the bladder evidenced by no urine return flow," the inspection report states.
Recognizing the severity of the situation, LVN B contacted the physician and received orders to transfer the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. The resident required emergency medical intervention that the nursing home could not provide.
But when inspectors arrived three weeks later to investigate, they found a critical gap in the medical record.
LVN A admitted during her November 4 interview that she had not documented the nurse-to-nurse report about the failed catheter insertion and bleeding complications. LVN B initially believed she had documented the incident details but discovered during the inspection that her records were incomplete.
"Upon record review stated she had not documented details to accurately document the chain of events," inspectors wrote.
The documentation failures violated the facility's own policies and industry standards for catheter insertion procedures. During a joint interview on November 5, the Administrator and Director of Nursing acknowledged that staff who provided care were expected to document enough details to effectively record the treatment given.
The facility follows clinical guidance that requires extensive documentation for catheter insertions, including assessment findings, complications, the name of the practitioner notified, date and time of notification, prescribed interventions, and the patient's response to those interventions.
According to the clinical standards the facility claims to follow, documentation should include the indication for catheter use, date and time of insertion, size and type of catheter, amount of sterile water used to inflate the balloon, characteristics and amount of urine, and any complications that arise.
None of those details appeared in Resident #1's medical record for the October 12 incident.
The Administrator and Director of Nursing told inspectors that inaccurate records posed potential negative outcomes for residents. Without proper documentation, future caregivers would have no way of knowing about the complications, the unsuccessful attempts, or the underlying medical condition that prevented successful catheter insertion.
The missing documentation left no trail of the medical emergency that unfolded over multiple shifts. No record of the bleeding. No record of the failed insertion attempts. No record of the enlarged prostate that prevented the procedure. No record of the physician consultation that led to emergency hospitalization.
The facility's documentation policy requires following evidence-based, step-by-step clinical resources that provide consistent and safe patient care guidelines. These resources offer detailed instructions and competency assessments specifically designed to ensure proper documentation of procedures like catheter insertion.
But for Resident #1, those standards meant nothing. The medical crisis that sent him to the hospital existed only in the memories of the nurses who lived through it, not in the permanent record that would guide his future care.
The inspection found the documentation failures affected few residents but created minimal harm or potential for actual harm. Federal inspectors classified the violation under regulations requiring nursing homes to maintain complete and accurate medical records for all residents.
For Resident #1, the enlarged prostate that prevented successful catheter insertion remained a documented medical reality. The emergency hospitalization it triggered did not.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Yoakum Nursing and Rehabilitation Center from 2025-11-18 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Yoakum Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
- Browse all TX nursing home inspections