Skip to main content
Advertisement

Avon Place Healthcare: Incomplete Injury Assessment - OH

Healthcare Facility:

The incomplete assessment at Avon Place Healthcare Center violated basic nursing protocols for evaluating injuries of unknown origin, federal inspectors found during a November complaint investigation.

Avon Place Healthcare Center facility inspection

Resident #77, who has cognitive impairment, was found with bruising on her hand. Registered Nurse #302 examined only the visible areas of the resident's skin after being notified of the injury.

Advertisement

"RN #302 revealed she had not removed the resident's gown to assess the resident's skin had not check the resident's range of motion for additional injuries," inspectors wrote.

The resident had told nursing assistants she was concerned about her leg. But that information never reached the nurse conducting the assessment.

Certified Nursing Assistant #306 acknowledged the nurse should have been notified before getting the resident out of bed. The assistant also revealed the resident's leg complaint was never reported to nursing staff.

When inspectors interviewed RN #302 on November 18, she confirmed she had looked only at the resident's hand and other visible skin areas. She had not performed the comprehensive evaluation required when residents present with unexplained injuries.

Licensed Practical Nurse #402 explained the proper protocol to inspectors. When a resident has an injury, staff should ask how it occurred and question staff who last worked with the resident.

"The resident should have a complete head to toe assessment to check for additional injuries," LPN #402 told inspectors. Range of motion should be assessed if safe to do so, and the physician should be notified.

The facility's own policy supports this approach. The Protocol for Focused Nursing Assessment states that such evaluations should identify immediate needs, monitor changes, and evaluate intervention effectiveness during acute changes in a patient's condition.

But the policy contains no specific guidelines for assessing range of motion or checking for additional injuries when cognitively impaired residents are found with bruising of unknown origin.

Director of Nursing staff defended the incomplete assessment during interviews. She told inspectors that nurses can assess residents while they move in bed and don't necessarily need to include range of motion testing.

The DON said she believed the nurse had properly assessed the resident, notified the physician, and implemented new orders. Based on the initial assessment, she didn't think range of motion testing was necessary.

However, the DON acknowledged that if a resident complains of pain in other areas, a head-to-toe assessment should be completed.

The case highlights gaps in injury assessment protocols for vulnerable residents who cannot clearly communicate how injuries occurred. Cognitively impaired residents may be unable to accurately describe when, where, or how they were hurt.

Federal inspectors found the facility's response fell short of accepted nursing standards. The incomplete assessment meant potential injuries to the resident's leg were never evaluated, despite her expressed concerns.

The violation was classified as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. But it represents a systemic failure in the facility's injury assessment procedures.

Resident #77's case demonstrates how communication breakdowns between nursing assistants and registered nurses can leave injuries undetected. The nursing assistant knew about the leg complaint but never passed that critical information to the RN conducting the assessment.

The facility's policy requires focused assessments during acute changes but provides no clear guidance for the specific situation staff encountered. This policy gap may have contributed to the inadequate response.

Without a complete evaluation, the facility cannot determine whether the resident sustained additional injuries beyond the visible hand bruising. The leg pain she reported to nursing assistants remains uninvestigated.

The inspection occurred as part of a complaint investigation, suggesting someone raised concerns about the facility's injury assessment practices. Federal regulators found those concerns were justified.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Avon Place Healthcare Center from 2025-11-18 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 24, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

AVON PLACE HEALTHCARE CENTER in AVON, OH was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 18, 2025.

Resident #77, who has cognitive impairment, was found with bruising on her hand.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at AVON PLACE HEALTHCARE CENTER?
Resident #77, who has cognitive impairment, was found with bruising on her hand.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in AVON, OH, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from AVON PLACE HEALTHCARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 365155.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check AVON PLACE HEALTHCARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.