Frankfort Community Care Home: Immediate Jeopardy Cited - KS
The facility is Frankfort Community Care Home, a nursing home in Frankfort, a town of roughly 700 people in Marshall County in northeastern Kansas. The November 17 inspection was a complaint investigation, meaning someone had contacted regulators with concerns serious enough to send inspectors to the door. What they found when they arrived resulted in 14 separate deficiency citations. The worst of them, a citation under the federal tag that requires nursing homes to keep their environment free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents, was classified at Scope/Severity Level J.
Level J means isolated immediate jeopardy. In the federal rating system, immediate jeopardy sits at the top of the severity scale. It means inspectors determined that the facility's failure placed one or more residents in a situation where serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death was likely unless the problem was corrected.
The inspection report does not describe in detail what the specific hazard was, who was at risk, or what supervision failures inspectors observed. What the record shows is that inspectors believed the situation was serious enough to require immediate action, and that the facility told regulators it had corrected the problem — but that correction was dated August 29, 2025, nearly three months before inspectors arrived.
That gap is the part of this record that raises questions the report does not answer.
A correction date of August 29 on a complaint inspection conducted November 17 means the facility is claiming it fixed the problem before inspectors ever showed up. In the federal inspection system, this status is recorded as "Past Non-Compliance." It means the deficiency existed, the facility acknowledged it, and the facility reported taking corrective action. Inspectors who arrive later and find no ongoing evidence of the violation can record it as past non-compliance rather than a current deficiency.
But the original problem was serious enough to reach immediate jeopardy. That designation does not get applied lightly. Inspectors are trained to use it only when they can point to a specific situation where a resident faced a likelihood of serious harm. Something happened at Frankfort Community Care Home, or was allowed to persist, that met that standard.
The inspection report does not name any residents. It does not describe the nature of the accident hazard inspectors identified. It does not say whether anyone was hurt. The public-facing record contains 767 characters of narrative, a number that reflects how little detail was made available in the version of the report from which this article is drawn.
What the record does show is that 14 deficiencies were cited in a single inspection of a single facility. Fourteen deficiencies in one visit is a significant number for any nursing home, and particularly significant for a small rural facility where the total resident census is likely limited. Each deficiency represents a finding that inspectors believed rose to the level of a regulatory violation. The immediate jeopardy citation was the most serious of those 14, but it was not the only one.
The federal tag at the center of the immediate jeopardy finding, F0689, covers one of the most fundamental obligations a nursing home carries. The requirement is straightforward: the environment must be free from accident hazards that the facility can reasonably control, and residents must receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Falls, elopements, medication errors that result from inadequate oversight, unsafe equipment left accessible to residents who cannot protect themselves, environmental conditions that create fall or injury risks — all of these can fall under F0689. The tag is one of the most commonly cited in nursing home inspections nationally, but citations at the immediate jeopardy level represent a small fraction of total F0689 findings. Most F0689 citations are lower severity. An immediate jeopardy finding means inspectors concluded the gap between what the facility was doing and what was required was wide enough to put someone in serious danger.
Frankfort Community Care Home sits in a part of Kansas where nursing home options are limited. For many residents and families in Marshall County, the facility is not one choice among several. It may be the only realistic option for an elderly or disabled person who needs around-the-clock care and cannot travel far from family. That context matters when evaluating what it means for a facility to receive an immediate jeopardy citation. Families who placed relatives at Frankfort Community Care Home did not necessarily have the option of moving them elsewhere when problems arose.
The complaint that triggered the November inspection is not identified in the public record. Someone contacted regulators, and regulators responded. That sequence suggests at least one person with knowledge of conditions inside the facility, whether a resident, a family member, a staff member, or a visitor, believed something was wrong enough to report it.
The facility's claim that it corrected the immediate jeopardy condition in August, before the November inspection, does not resolve the underlying question of what the condition was and how long it existed before it was addressed. Immediate jeopardy conditions by definition represent a failure that has already reached a critical threshold. The correction of such a condition is necessary, but it is not the same as the condition never having existed.
Among the 14 deficiencies cited during the inspection, the record does not provide detail on the other 13. Each one represents a finding that inspectors believed warranted a citation. Some may have been lower severity, paperwork or administrative failures that carry no direct risk to residents. Others may have involved direct care. The inspection record available for this article does not break them down.
What the record establishes is this: a nursing home in a small Kansas town was the subject of a complaint investigation in November 2025. Inspectors arrived and found 14 deficiencies. The most serious of those deficiencies was an immediate jeopardy finding tied to accident hazards and supervision failures, the kind of finding that, when inspectors make it, means they believe a resident faced a real likelihood of serious harm. The facility said it had fixed the problem three months earlier.
Whether residents at Frankfort Community Care Home are safe today, and whether the conditions that produced an immediate jeopardy finding in the first place have been genuinely resolved rather than papered over, is not something the available record answers. The inspection report documents what inspectors found and what the facility reported. It does not document what happened to the resident or residents who were at risk. It does not say whether anyone was injured. It does not describe what the facility's environment looked like before August 29, when the correction was supposedly made, or what it looked like on November 17, when inspectors walked in.
Someone in Frankfort, Kansas, or in the surrounding communities of Marshall County, has a family member living at that facility. They may not know that inspectors visited in November. They may not know that an immediate jeopardy citation was issued. They may not know that 14 deficiencies were found in a single day of inspection. The federal inspection database is public, but it is not easy to navigate, and most families do not know to look.
The record exists. The questions it raises do not have answers in the pages inspectors made available.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Frankfort Community Care Home from 2025-11-17 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: September 1, 2026 · Our methodology
FRANKFORT COMMUNITY CARE HOME in FRANKFORT, KS was cited for immediate jeopardy violations during a health inspection on November 17, 2025.
The facility is Frankfort Community Care Home, a nursing home in Frankfort, a town of roughly 700 people in Marshall County in northeastern Kansas.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.