Skip to main content
Advertisement

Frankfort Care Home: Cold Food Served to Residents - KS

Healthcare Facility:

The violation occurred during the noon meal on September 30th at Frankfort Community Care Home, where dietary staff member CC prepared pork chops with gravy, mashed potatoes, and broccoli for the facility's 27 residents.

Frankfort Community Care Home facility inspection

CC ground three pork chops in a commercial food processor and placed the plastic bowl in the steam table. She then made plates for three residents and served them without taking any food temperatures.

Advertisement

When an inspector asked if she planned to check temperatures before serving other residents, CC claimed she had already taken temperatures earlier but hadn't documented it. She said she would take them again.

The inspector continued watching as CC prepared the pureed version of the meal and took temperatures for the main meal and pureed food, but skipped the ground pork chop entirely. She plated meals for two residents who were supposed to receive the ground meat and served them without checking the temperature.

CC continued plating meals for the remaining residents in the dining room. When asked why she hadn't checked the ground meat temperature before serving, she said, "I forgot, but would take it now."

The temperature reading revealed the problem: 105 degrees Fahrenheit.

That temperature falls squarely in what food safety experts call the danger zone, where harmful bacteria multiply rapidly. The facility's own policy requires hot foods to be maintained at or above 135 degrees to prevent foodborne illness.

CC told inspectors no other residents would receive the ground meat.

Dietary supervisor BB acknowledged the violation, saying CC "should have obtained food temperatures before serving the meal to the residents." BB said she had been working with dietary staff on proper temperature procedures and that "staff are starting to do a lot better at food temperatures than they used to be."

The admission suggests temperature checking has been an ongoing problem at the facility.

The facility's food preparation policy acknowledges that identifying potential hazards and following critical control points can reduce contamination risk and minimize foodborne illness. The policy requires staff to use clean, sanitized, and calibrated thermometers to ensure accuracy.

The document warns that the danger zone between 41 and 135 degrees "promotes the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause food borne illness." It states that "the longer foods remain in the danger zone the greater the risk for growth of harmful pathogens."

Ground meat presents particular risks because the grinding process can distribute bacteria throughout the product, unlike whole cuts where harmful organisms typically remain on the surface. Serving ground pork at 105 degrees means any bacteria present had optimal conditions to multiply before residents consumed it.

The violation affected multiple residents who received the improperly monitored food. At least two residents definitely ate the 105-degree ground pork, and three others received meals before any temperatures were checked at all.

Federal inspectors classified this as a violation with minimal harm or potential for actual harm, but foodborne illness can be particularly dangerous for elderly residents whose immune systems may be compromised.

The inspection was triggered by a complaint, though the report doesn't specify what prompted the investigation. The temperature violation was documented as part of a broader review of food safety practices at the facility.

This represents a fundamental breakdown in food safety protocols designed to protect vulnerable residents from preventable illness. Despite having written policies and ongoing training efforts, kitchen staff failed to follow basic temperature monitoring procedures that form the foundation of safe food service in institutional settings.

The residents who consumed the inadequately monitored meals remained at risk for foodborne illness in the days following the violation.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Frankfort Community Care Home from 2025-11-17 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 25, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

FRANKFORT COMMUNITY CARE HOME in FRANKFORT, KS was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 17, 2025.

CC ground three pork chops in a commercial food processor and placed the plastic bowl in the steam table.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at FRANKFORT COMMUNITY CARE HOME?
CC ground three pork chops in a commercial food processor and placed the plastic bowl in the steam table.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in FRANKFORT, KS, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from FRANKFORT COMMUNITY CARE HOME or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 175417.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check FRANKFORT COMMUNITY CARE HOME's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.