The resident, identified as Resident #100, lived in an independent living apartment before his stay at the nursing facility. When he left in May 2025, staff sent him back to that apartment but failed to provide basic discharge planning required by federal regulations.

A home health nurse discovered the problem during her first visit on May 17. Registered Nurse #504 found the resident had no insulin in his apartment and no primary care physician to contact for prescriptions. She was forced to call the facility's nurse practitioner directly, requesting an insulin order be sent to the resident's apartment.
"She had to assist Resident #504 with finding a primary care physician," according to the inspection report.
The facility's own nurse practitioner expressed surprise at how the discharge was handled. NP #501 told inspectors that Resident #100 had voiced concerns about not being ready to go home, specifically related to his insulin needs. She assumed he was being discharged to an assisted living facility, not an independent apartment.
"NP #501 stated she was certain Resident #100 went home with home health referral because a home health care nurse called her to ask for a prescription for insulin because the resident was discharged without any insulin and without having a primary care physician in place," inspectors wrote.
The discharge documentation was equally problematic. The facility's discharge transfer form was essentially blank. Sections for nursing services, dietary services, activities, and rehabilitation services contained no information. The form wasn't even signed.
Staff also incorrectly documented where the resident was going. They listed him as being discharged to an assisted living facility, but the Director of Nursing at that facility confirmed Resident #100 had never lived there. He had always resided in an independent living apartment.
The Administrator admitted the facility's failures during an October 29 interview. She verified that Resident #100 was discharged without a discharge summary, without a discharge plan, and without a primary care physician in place or scheduled follow-up appointment.
This violated the facility's own policy from October 2022, which requires a discharge summary and post-discharge plan when a resident's discharge is anticipated. The policy states these documents should assist the resident with discharge and provide a final summary of the resident's status.
The problems extended beyond this single case. Inspectors discovered the facility had been failing to notify the state Ombudsman's Office about discharges for at least six months, despite being required to do so monthly.
From May through October 2025, the facility sent discharge lists to what they believed was the Ombudsman's fax number. But Ombudsman #506 told inspectors her office received no notifications during that period. The fax number the facility had been using wasn't even connected to the Ombudsman's Office.
"The Administrator reported the facility was not aware of the incorrect number where the faxes were being sent," inspectors noted. The facility had no documented evidence that discharge notifications were actually reaching the Ombudsman's Office.
The Ombudsman confirmed she was unaware that Resident #100 had been discharged from the facility.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to develop comprehensive discharge plans to ensure residents can safely transition back to the community. The plans should address ongoing medical needs, medication management, and follow-up care arrangements.
For diabetic residents, insulin management is particularly critical. Interruptions in insulin therapy can lead to dangerous blood sugar fluctuations, potentially causing diabetic ketoacidosis or other life-threatening complications.
The inspection was conducted as part of a complaint investigation numbered 1367217. Inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents.
The case illustrates how discharge planning failures can leave vulnerable residents without essential medical support. Resident #100's situation required a home health nurse to step in as an advocate, tracking down insulin prescriptions and helping locate a primary care physician - services that should have been arranged before discharge.
The facility's Administrator acknowledged during the October interview that proper discharge procedures had not been followed, leaving the diabetic resident to navigate his medical needs without the support systems that federal regulations are designed to ensure.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Bellbrook Health and Rehab from 2025-11-17 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.