Skip to main content
Advertisement

The Center at Grande: Failed Lab Orders Leave Doctor Uninformed - TX

Healthcare Facility:

The resident had been admitted to The Center at Grande on September 16 with conditions requiring careful monitoring. Her care plan specifically targeted complications from hypothyroidism and high blood pressure, with goals of preventing complications over the next 90 days through lab monitoring and physician reporting.

The Center At Grande facility inspection

One week after admission, the facility was supposed to draw blood for CBC, CMP, TSH, and Vitamin D tests. Staff C attempted the blood draw on September 24 but failed twice. The next day, Staff C approached LVN D on the second floor, who had helped with difficult draws before.

Advertisement

LVN D also couldn't successfully draw the blood.

After multiple failed attempts by two different staff members, the resident refused to allow any more tries. The required lab work was never completed.

A handwritten statement provided by the facility and dated September 29 documented Staff C's version of events. The statement described the unsuccessful attempts but revealed no communication with supervisors or the ordering physician during the five-day period when the labs should have been drawn and reported.

The facility's Director of Nursing said during a November 16 interview that she wasn't aware of Staff C's failed attempts until after the resident had already been discharged. She confirmed that the one-week post-admission labs were never completed.

"Staff C and LVN D should have told her or the resident's doctor," the DON said.

The resident's physician, who had written the orders for the laboratory tests, said during a telephone interview that he had never been made aware the labs weren't completed. He said he hadn't been notified of the unsuccessful attempts to collect the specimen.

"He would have expected Staff C to inform her nurse manager or for the facility to contact him directly, so the matter could have been addressed," according to the inspection report. The physician stated that not doing the lab work "would never be an option" and said he wished he had been notified.

The DON acknowledged the facility didn't have a system in place to verify labs were completed, saying that hadn't been an issue before to her knowledge. She said the facility used its own staff to draw blood because everything was handled in-house rather than contracted out.

She described Staff C as competent, with no complaints, and said Staff C had been trained on how to draw laboratory specimens.

The facility provided an education record dated September 29 and signed by both the DON and Staff C. The training emphasized that if Staff C was unable to obtain blood from a patient, Staff C must immediately notify the charge nurse and the DON.

This training occurred five days after the initial failed attempts and three days after LVN D's unsuccessful try.

When inspectors attempted to interview LVN B, the staff member who had entered the lab orders, the telephone number provided by the facility wasn't working. No interview was obtained.

Staff C also didn't answer when inspectors called, and although they left a message with a callback number, no interview was completed.

The facility's laboratory services policy, revised in April 2024, requires staff to provide laboratory services when ordered by physicians and promptly notify ordering physicians of results that fall outside clinical reference ranges. The policy makes no mention of notification requirements when labs cannot be completed.

During the DON's interview, she initially said the one-week post-admission labs were "a mistake made by the staff when entering the order." Later in the same interview, she confirmed the labs were ordered correctly but were never drawn.

The resident's care plan had specifically identified the need to monitor lab results per physician's orders and report results to physicians as part of managing her thyroid condition. For her blood pressure management, the plan called for obtaining and monitoring lab work as ordered and notifying the physician of any changes in condition.

Neither monitoring goal could be met without the blood work that was never successfully drawn.

The inspection found the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided as ordered, affecting the resident's ability to receive appropriate medical monitoring during a critical post-admission period when baseline values needed to be established for ongoing care management.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for The Center At Grande from 2025-11-16 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 25, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

THE CENTER AT GRANDE in TYLER, TX was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 16, 2025.

The resident had been admitted to The Center at Grande on September 16 with conditions requiring careful monitoring.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at THE CENTER AT GRANDE?
The resident had been admitted to The Center at Grande on September 16 with conditions requiring careful monitoring.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in TYLER, TX, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from THE CENTER AT GRANDE or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 676443.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check THE CENTER AT GRANDE's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.