Skip to main content
Advertisement

Ballard Center: CPR Training Failures During Emergency - WA

Healthcare Facility:

The resident had completed a POLST form electing "do not attempt resuscitation" status. The form was kept in a binder at the nurses' station, and the resident's DNR order was transcribed on every page of their medication administration record.

Ballard  Center facility inspection

But when an emergency occurred, none of that mattered.

Advertisement

Staff C, who was involved in the response, admitted inspectors that verification of the resident's code status "was not performed." When asked about checking physician orders in the resident's electronic health record, Staff C said: "Yes, we didn't get a chance to see that."

The Director of Nursing later confirmed what happened. "No it was not," Staff A said when inspectors asked if the resident's advance directive was honored during the emergency.

Staff A explained that the facility expected workers to verify a resident's code status using the POLST form during emergencies. But the form "was not available for the nurses to verify," she told inspectors.

The confusion points to a deeper problem at Ballard Center. Key staff members lacked current CPR certifications, raising questions about their preparedness for the very emergency they mishandled.

Staff E, a Licensed Practical Nurse, worked 23 days in one month and 24 days the following month according to staffing schedules. When inspectors interviewed Staff E, they discovered the nurse's CPR certification had lapsed.

"Now it's due," Staff E admitted.

The nurse said they had received CPR training from another workplace, but couldn't provide current certification from Ballard Center.

Staff F, a Certified Nursing Assistant who worked 20 days in one month, faced the same problem. The CNA told inspectors they were "scheduled to receive CPR training but that it was postponed."

When asked about their last CPR training, Staff F said it was "maybe years ago, and long time ago."

The facility's payroll administrator couldn't immediately produce the required certifications. Staff G and the Director of Nursing told inspectors they "would provide requested CPR certifications as able" during a follow-up interview.

The documents didn't surface until the next day.

At 6:24 PM, nearly 24 hours after inspectors first requested proof of training, Staff A finally provided CPR certifications for both workers. The certificates showed they had completed training on the same day inspectors asked for documentation.

The timing raised obvious questions about when the training actually occurred and whether the facility was scrambling to cover gaps in required certifications.

Staff A told inspectors that licensed staff were expected to complete required CPR training. But the evidence suggested the facility wasn't tracking compliance or ensuring workers maintained current certifications.

The emergency response failures extended beyond missing paperwork. Staff B, interviewed during a joint record review, confirmed that workers were supposed to check the master copy of completed POLST forms kept at each nurses' station.

Staff B also noted that residents' code status could be referenced through their electronic health record profile and physician orders. Multiple systems existed to verify a resident's wishes about resuscitation.

Yet somehow, during an actual emergency, none of these safeguards worked.

The resident's POLST form clearly showed they had elected DNAR status. Their physician orders included a DNR directive. The code status appeared on every page of their medication administration record, as Staff C acknowledged: "Every page on the MAR has the advance directives."

Staff C even told inspectors that "the expectation is to go by what the orders say."

But when it mattered most, those expectations collapsed.

The facility's Director of Nursing explained that advance directives, including POLST forms, were discussed with residents on admission. The process was designed to ensure residents' end-of-life wishes would be respected.

Instead, Ballard Center staff ignored a resident's explicit instructions about resuscitation while lacking the very training certifications that might have helped them respond appropriately to the emergency they mishandled.

The resident who elected not to be resuscitated received CPR anyway, delivered by staff whose certifications had lapsed years earlier.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Ballard Center from 2025-11-14 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 25, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

BALLARD CENTER in SEATTLE, WA was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 14, 2025.

The resident had completed a POLST form electing "do not attempt resuscitation" status.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at BALLARD CENTER?
The resident had completed a POLST form electing "do not attempt resuscitation" status.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SEATTLE, WA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from BALLARD CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 505042.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check BALLARD CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.