Skip to main content
Advertisement

Alameda Care Center: Fall Documentation Delayed Week - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The November 6 fall at Alameda Care Center triggered a cascade of documentation failures that stretched over seven days, federal inspectors found during a complaint investigation completed November 13.

Alameda Care Center facility inspection

CNA 1 had brought the resident to the dining room entrance for activities but didn't escort them to a table. After clocking out, the nursing assistant spotted the resident on the floor while leaving the facility.

Advertisement

The Director of Nursing was leaving her office across from the dining room at 3 p.m. when she discovered the resident on the floor, lying on their right side in a fetal position.

Nobody documented the fall properly until inspectors arrived a week later.

The facility's own policy requires immediate creation of a Change of Condition assessment when residents fall. Staff must document vital signs each shift for 72 hours, complete care plan updates, and notify the physician and responsible party the same day.

None of that happened on November 6.

The Director of Nursing told inspectors the Change of Condition documentation "was created only today" — November 13, the day of the federal inspection. Electronic records confirmed the assessment form was generated at 10:56 a.m. that morning, seven days after the fall.

"The COC for Resident 1's fall was created only today," the Director of Nursing acknowledged during the interview.

Federal regulations require Change of Condition assessments within 24 hours of significant incidents like falls. The Director of Nursing explained the documentation "should have been done on the same day or it can be an hour later but should be done during the shift."

The facility failed to provide evidence that staff notified the resident's physician or responsible party on November 6, as required by both federal regulations and the nursing home's internal policies.

More critically, the resident received no specialized monitoring after the fall. The Director of Nursing confirmed there was "no 72 hours monitoring for the fall" and that required shift-by-shift assessments "did not occur" because they weren't documented.

"COC monitoring should be per shift for 72 hours after a new COC," the Director of Nursing explained to inspectors.

The documentation gaps extended beyond the initial assessment. Care plan updates, which should follow within 24 hours of a Change of Condition, weren't completed until November 13 — the same day inspectors arrived.

"The care plans were also not done until today," the Director of Nursing admitted.

The facility's Change of Condition policy, last reviewed January 29, 2025, defines such incidents as "a sudden or marked difference in resident" that must be "handled promptly." The policy specifically requires documentation for at least 72 hours, vital signs each shift, and evidence of care plan updates.

The nursing home's Incident and Accidents policy places responsibility on the charge nurse to ensure "completeness and accuracy" of incident reports. The policy mandates a complete body check, documentation of pre-incident activities, physician notification, family notification, care plan entries, and investigation completion within five days.

The Director of Nursing acknowledged the consequences of the documentation failures. "Not documenting the COC can result to not providing the appropriate interventions and/or not following the plan of care," she told inspectors.

Without proper Change of Condition monitoring, staff cannot track whether residents develop complications from falls, such as internal injuries, cognitive changes, or increased fall risk. The monitoring protocols exist specifically to catch deteriorating conditions that might not be immediately apparent.

The Director of Staff Development confirmed the basic facts during a separate interview, stating that CNA 1 "placed Resident 1 into the dining room for activities and left Resident 1 in the dining room by doorway then CNA 1 clocked out and while clocking out and passed by dining room saw Resident 1 on the floor."

The inspection found the facility in violation of federal requirements for comprehensive assessments following significant changes in resident condition. The violation was classified as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm to a few residents.

The resident remained on the dining room floor until staff could respond, having been left unattended in the doorway while the nursing assistant who brought them there clocked out for the day.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Alameda Care Center from 2025-11-13 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 26, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

ALAMEDA CARE CENTER in BURBANK, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 13, 2025.

CNA 1 had brought the resident to the dining room entrance for activities but didn't escort them to a table.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at ALAMEDA CARE CENTER?
CNA 1 had brought the resident to the dining room entrance for activities but didn't escort them to a table.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in BURBANK, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from ALAMEDA CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 555690.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check ALAMEDA CARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.