Federal inspectors found Westwood Health and Rehabilitation left Resident 1 unsupervised at the nurses station on October 21, despite orders for one-to-one monitoring following sexual assaults on October 4 and October 18.
The targeted resident, identified as Resident 2, appeared confused during the inspection and answered questions in a nonsensical manner while sitting alert in bed.
Administrator interviews revealed staff confusion about supervision requirements. The director of nursing told inspectors she was educating staff that one-to-one sitters must stay with residents wherever they go. She had been on leave and was just beginning her investigation into the October 18 incident when inspectors arrived.
The facility administrator acknowledged immediate notification of both incidents but could not explain why Resident 1 repeatedly targeted the same victim. Prior to October 4, Resident 1 had never touched anyone inappropriately.
Staff struggled with medication compliance. The administrator revealed Resident 1 had been refusing Prozac but they found a way to place it in food. The antidepressant is commonly prescribed for behavioral issues in nursing homes.
During the October 21 inspection, inconsistent supervision continued. Inspectors observed Resident 1 without a sitter at 3:05 PM, then with supervision at 4:30 PM. The administrator confirmed staff had not consistently provided required monitoring but said the sitter was back in place while investigations continued.
The facility had initiated discharge planning after the first incident. A previous social worker had begun searching for a more appropriate setting for Resident 1, with a new social worker scheduled to start October 23.
The administrator defended staff response, stating they had done their best intervening and stopped the inappropriate behavior quickly when it occurred.
However, the repeat incident on October 18 demonstrated the failure of protective measures. Despite psychiatric evaluation following the first assault and orders for constant supervision, the same resident accessed the same victim again.
The director of nursing admitted uncertainty about why Resident 1 seemed to seek out Resident 2 specifically. She confirmed Resident 1 remained on one-to-one supervision pending clearance from psychiatry and psychology services.
Federal inspectors cited the facility for failing to protect residents from harm, noting minimal harm or potential for actual harm affecting few residents. The violation occurred under regulations requiring nursing homes to ensure each resident receives care free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
The case highlights ongoing challenges nursing homes face managing residents with behavioral issues while protecting vulnerable populations. Resident 2's apparent cognitive impairment made them particularly susceptible to repeated victimization.
Staff education deficiencies became apparent during the investigation. The director of nursing's acknowledgment that staff were unclear about one-to-one supervision requirements suggests systemic training failures beyond this specific incident.
The facility's medication management approach raised additional concerns. Hiding Prozac in food, while addressing compliance issues, reflects the complex balance between resident rights and safety needs in long-term care settings.
Two weeks separated the incidents, providing ample time for staff training and protocol clarification. The October 18 assault occurred despite psychiatric intervention and supervision orders, indicating broader systemic failures in resident protection.
The administrator's statement that staff stopped inappropriate behavior "quickly" when it occurred suggests reactive rather than preventive care. True resident protection requires preventing incidents, not just responding after harm occurs.
Resident 2 remained vulnerable throughout the inspection period. Their confused state and nonsensical responses during inspector interviews demonstrated the cognitive impairment that likely made them an easy target for repeated assault.
The facility's discharge planning efforts, while appropriate, moved slowly. Two and a half weeks elapsed between the first incident and the new social worker's scheduled start date, leaving Resident 2 at continued risk during the interim.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to investigate allegations immediately and implement protective measures. The director of nursing's admission that she was "just starting" her investigation into the October 18 incident on October 21 suggests delayed response to serious allegations.
The case underscores the vulnerability of nursing home residents with cognitive impairments and the critical importance of consistent staff supervision and training in preventing sexual assault in long-term care facilities.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Westwood Health and Rehabilitation from 2025-11-07 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Westwood Health and Rehabilitation
- Browse all NC nursing home inspections