The facility's own policy requires an interdisciplinary team to review every fall within 72 hours and modify prevention strategies as needed. Instead, staff documented none of the required reviews and failed to add new interventions for multiple falls involving the most vulnerable residents.
Resident B, who has a history of stroke affecting the left side, epilepsy and dementia with behavioral disturbance, was already classified as high risk for falls due to confusion, incontinence and poor communication. Between August 13 and August 23, the resident fell five times.
The facility documented no interdisciplinary team review for any of those falls. After the final fall on August 23, staff added no new interventions to prevent future incidents.
Resident E faced similar neglect despite an even more dangerous pattern. Diagnosed with senile brain degeneration, convulsions, dementia and walking difficulties, the resident was classified as high risk due to gait problems, incontinence, poor safety awareness and medication side effects.
This resident fell seven times between August 15 and September 18, including twice in a single day. Staff documented no team reviews for any of these falls and failed to add interventions after the August 15 and September 2 incidents.
The most concerning case involved Resident F, who suffered an intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, has difficulty walking, repeated falls, dementia and Parkinson's disease. The resident's care plan identified multiple risk factors including an unsteady gait, walking too fast, Parkinson's symptoms and a history of traumatic brain injury.
Between August 12 and October 18, this resident fell seven times. Staff documented no interdisciplinary team reviews for any of these falls and added no new intervention after the October 6 incident.
During the November 6 inspection, the Director of Nursing admitted the facility had failed its residents. He told inspectors that while interdisciplinary team reviews had occurred during morning meetings, he had failed to document the root cause analysis and review process. He also acknowledged failing to add interventions for some falls.
The nursing director confirmed that both documentation and intervention updates should be completed after each resident fall.
The facility's own policy, provided to inspectors on November 7, explicitly states the interdisciplinary team "will review the investigative reports on a regular basis, as they many occur, and make systemic changes to reasonably limit future occurrences." The policy requires the team to "consider change in plan of care interventions" and review fall prevention strategies within 72 hours of each incident.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain an accident-free environment and provide adequate supervision to prevent injuries. When falls do occur, facilities must conduct thorough assessments to identify causes and implement preventive measures.
The three residents' medical conditions made fall prevention particularly critical. Dementia patients often lack awareness of their limitations and may attempt unsafe movements. Parkinson's disease affects balance and coordination, while previous brain injuries can impair judgment and mobility.
Without proper post-fall assessments, facilities cannot identify whether falls result from environmental hazards, medication effects, inadequate supervision or other preventable factors. The lack of care plan updates means residents continue facing the same risks that caused their initial falls.
The inspection findings reveal a systematic failure to protect the facility's most vulnerable residents. Each of the three residents was already identified as high risk for falls, yet the facility failed to respond appropriately when those predictions proved accurate.
Resident B's five falls in an 11-day period should have triggered intensive review and intervention. Instead, staff allowed the pattern to continue without modification. Resident E's seven falls over five weeks, including two in one day, received the same inadequate response.
Most troubling was the treatment of Resident F, whose combination of Parkinson's disease, dementia and previous brain injury created extreme fall risk. Seven falls over two months warranted aggressive prevention strategies, yet staff added no new interventions after the October 6 incident.
The Director of Nursing's admission that reviews occurred but weren't documented suggests the facility may have conducted some analysis. However, the lack of documentation prevents verification that proper assessments occurred and makes it impossible to track whether interventions were considered or implemented.
The failure to update care plans after multiple falls left residents without enhanced protection. Each fall represented an opportunity to identify new risk factors, adjust medications, modify environments or increase supervision. Instead, residents remained vulnerable to repeated injuries.
All three residents continue living at the facility with the same conditions that contributed to their falls, but without the additional safeguards that proper post-fall assessments might have provided.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Plainfield Health Care Center from 2025-11-07 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Plainfield Health Care Center
- Browse all IN nursing home inspections