The dispute at Clayton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center involved Resident #26, who was receiving end-of-life care. The resident had a pressure wound on his right hip that measured 5 centimeters in width, 4.5 centimeters in length, and 1 centimeter deep with tunneling and serosanguineous drainage.
During a visit on October 20, the hospice nurse observed a dressing change with facility Nurse #13. The hospice nurse assessed the resident's pain using the PAINAD scale, designed for patients with advanced dementia who cannot communicate their pain effectively. He scored the resident's pain at 3, indicating mild to moderate pain on the 0-10 scale.
The hospice nurse concluded that acetaminophen was insufficient. "Resident #26 needed a pain medication stronger than acetaminophen for his dressing changes due to the wound infection," he told inspectors during a phone interview on October 22.
He requested orders for morphine and Ativan from the hospice provider. The morphine was intended to treat moderate to severe pain, while Ativan would provide anxiety relief and sedation. The hospice nurse explained these medications address "common symptoms and needs in the end-of-life care" and said Ativan specifically helps relieve anxiety symptoms like increased heart rate, rapid breathing, and restlessness in hospice residents.
The facility's nurse practitioner disagreed completely.
During a phone interview on October 27, she told inspectors the hospice nurse had informed her of the new PRN orders for morphine and Ativan on October 24. "She did not feel those medications were appropriate as Resident #26 was not exhibiting any signs/symptoms of pain," according to the inspection report.
The nurse practitioner maintained that "the acetaminophen would have been strong enough to help with any pain or discomfort related to the wound infection and dressing changes." She said she had observed a dressing change for Resident #26 but could not recall the specific date and "did not observe any signs/symptoms of pain or discomfort during the dressing change."
The wound itself presented clear signs of infection and severity. The hospice progress note documented serosanguineous drainage, which is a mixture of blood and serum, along with tunneling that creates narrow deep channels extending from the skin's surface into underlying tissues. The "pungent" odor suggested bacterial infection.
Federal inspectors found the facility failed to ensure proper communication about the resident's care needs. When questioned about the disagreement, facility administrators acknowledged a breakdown in the process.
The Regional Director of Operations, Administrator, and Regional Clinical Director told inspectors on October 27 that "if the nursing staff was unable to reach and/or communicate with the hospice staff in regard to concerns about Resident #26, the nursing staff should alert the NP."
But that protocol appeared to break down in this case. The hospice nurse made his assessment and medication request on October 20, yet the facility's nurse practitioner was not informed until October 24 — a four-day delay that left the resident's pain management in limbo.
The timing proved significant because hospice care focuses on comfort rather than cure. The PAINAD scale assessment tool exists specifically because dementia patients often cannot verbally express their pain levels, requiring caregivers to observe behavioral and physiological indicators.
The hospice nurse's professional judgment, based on observing the dressing change and assessing the wound's condition, led him to conclude that a resident with a 5-centimeter infected wound needed stronger pain relief than acetaminophen during dressing changes. The facility's nurse practitioner reached the opposite conclusion based on her own observations.
Federal inspectors cited the facility for failing to ensure residents receive appropriate treatment and services. The violation carried a determination of "minimal harm or potential for actual harm" affecting few residents.
The case highlighted the complex dynamics when hospice care intersects with nursing home operations. While hospice nurses specialize in end-of-life comfort care, facility staff maintain responsibility for residents' overall medical management.
For Resident #26, the disagreement meant uncertainty about pain relief during what the hospice nurse described as necessary but potentially painful dressing changes for an infected wound that continued to drain and emit a strong odor.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Clayton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from 2025-10-30 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Clayton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
- Browse all NC nursing home inspections