Skip to main content
Advertisement

Hartley Nursing: Discharge Without Home Health - MD

Healthcare Facility:

The resident at Hartley Nursing and Rehab was sent to an apartment on December 3rd. Home health referrals weren't submitted until December 6th. Services didn't actually begin until December 10th.

Hartley Nursing and Rehab facility inspection

"This was the first discharge she had made to independent living and was not aware of the resources the Resident needed," the social worker told state inspectors during an October complaint investigation.

Advertisement

The resident had lived at Hartley since March 2022 for rehabilitation following hospitalization. By August 2024, insurance reviewers determined the person no longer qualified for nursing home care. The denial notice was blunt: the resident had good mental status, needed no skilled nursing services, no daily medications, displayed no behavioral issues, and required no hands-on help with daily activities.

But when discharge day arrived four months later, nobody had arranged the transition services.

The social worker, identified as Staff #9 in inspection records, admitted she didn't know what referrals to make. A regional social worker had to step in and explain what the resident needed.

"Staff #9 should have ensured the referrals were in place at discharge," the regional social worker told inspectors.

The regional social worker, Staff #11, did ensure the resident left with medications and household items. She arranged for the nursing home to provide meals and educated the resident about a call system connecting the apartment to nursing home staff for emergencies.

The apartment was located behind a sister nursing facility. But proximity didn't solve the service gap.

Home health services finally started December 10th, a full week after discharge. The resident received physical therapy, skilled nursing visits, and home aide assistance.

The regional social worker made the home health referral on December 6th. Meals on wheels was also arranged that day, three days after the person had already moved out.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to ensure residents have necessary services lined up before discharge. The facility's director of nursing confirmed to inspectors that staff had failed this requirement.

This was one of four community discharges inspectors reviewed during the complaint survey. The other three met federal standards.

The violation carried minimal harm designation, meaning no actual injury occurred but the potential existed. State inspectors classified it as affecting few residents.

Insurance had denied continued nursing home coverage in August based on the resident's independence level. The person scored well on mental status tests, managed medications without help, and handled all activities of daily living alone.

Yet the transition to independent living stumbled on basic coordination. The social worker's inexperience with community discharges left essential services unscheduled.

The regional social worker's intervention salvaged the situation, but only after the resident had already spent three days in the apartment without arranged support services.

The facility's lapse occurred despite clear documentation of what the resident would need. Insurance reviewers had evaluated the person's capabilities months earlier. Discharge planning had time to develop appropriate community connections.

Instead, the resident moved to independent living with medications and meals but no formal home health structure in place. Physical therapy, skilled nursing checks, and home aide visits all had to wait for paperwork filed after the fact.

The call system linking the apartment to nursing home staff provided emergency backup. But it couldn't replace the comprehensive home health services the resident required for successful community living.

The inspection found Hartley's discharge process had broken down at a critical juncture. Moving someone from institutional care to independent living requires careful service coordination. This resident experienced the gap when that coordination failed.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Hartley Nursing and Rehab from 2025-10-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

HARTLEY NURSING AND REHAB in POCOMOKE CITY, MD was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 29, 2025.

The resident at Hartley Nursing and Rehab was sent to an apartment on December 3rd.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at HARTLEY NURSING AND REHAB?
The resident at Hartley Nursing and Rehab was sent to an apartment on December 3rd.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in POCOMOKE CITY, MD, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from HARTLEY NURSING AND REHAB or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 215134.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check HARTLEY NURSING AND REHAB's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.