Skip to main content
Advertisement

Meadow Creek Post-Acute: Maggots Found in Trach Site - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The nurse, identified as RNS 3, found the maggots during routine care and immediately contacted the resident's physician. She told the doctor about the infestation and arranged for the resident to be transferred to a hospital for evaluation and treatment.

Meadow Creek Post-acute facility inspection

But RNS 3 never documented what she found.

Advertisement

During an interview on October 24, 2025, she admitted to federal inspectors that she did not record the incident in the resident's electronic health record. She did not complete the facility's required SBAR communication form. She did not submit a change of condition report, despite the obvious severity of finding maggots in a surgical opening in the resident's throat.

The nurse also spoke with the resident's family member about the hospital transfer. She told them their loved one was being moved to the hospital. But she did not explain that the transfer was specifically for re-evaluation of the resident's wound and the maggot infestation that had developed around the tracheostomy site.

When pressed by inspectors, RNS 3 acknowledged her response to the incident violated both facility policy and basic nursing standards of practice.

The facility's Director of Nursing told inspectors that given the serious nature of finding maggots around a tracheostomy, there should have been multiple forms of documentation. An incident report should have been filed immediately. Progress notes should have captured the change in the resident's condition. The resident's care plan should have been updated to reflect the new medical situation.

None of that happened.

Federal inspectors reviewed three separate facility policies that RNS 3 had violated. The facility's 2021 policy on changes in resident condition states clearly that nurses must record information about changes in residents' medical condition or status in their medical records.

The job description for registered nurses at Meadow Creek Post-Acute requires them to ensure "appropriate and timely documentation of resident care activities." The facility's 2017 policy on accidents and incidents mandates that charge nurses "promptly initiate and document investigation" of any incident.

A tracheostomy is a surgical opening in the front of the neck that allows breathing through a tube inserted directly into the trachea. Patients with tracheostomies require careful monitoring and cleaning to prevent infections and complications. The presence of maggots around such a site indicates a serious breakdown in wound care and hygiene.

The inspection report does not detail how long the maggots had been present or what conditions allowed them to develop. It also does not specify the resident's current condition or the outcome of the hospital evaluation.

The violation was classified as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. But the failure to document such a serious incident raises questions about what other medical events at the facility might go unrecorded.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain complete and accurate medical records for all residents. These records serve multiple critical functions: they guide ongoing medical care, provide legal protection for both residents and staff, and allow regulators to track patterns of care quality.

When nurses fail to document incidents like maggot infestations, it creates gaps in the medical record that can compromise future care decisions. It also makes it impossible for administrators, physicians, and family members to understand the full scope of a resident's medical history and current needs.

The documentation failures at Meadow Creek Post-Acute extended beyond just missing paperwork. By not fully informing the family about the reason for hospitalization, the nurse denied them the opportunity to make informed decisions about their loved one's care and to ask appropriate questions of hospital staff.

The incident also highlights potential communication breakdowns within the facility. While RNS 3 contacted the physician and arranged the transfer, the lack of formal documentation means there may be no institutional memory of the event beyond what individuals happened to witness or remember.

RNS 3's admission that her actions violated both facility policy and nursing standards suggests she understood the requirements but chose not to follow them. The inspection report does not indicate what disciplinary action, if any, the facility took in response to these violations.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Meadow Creek Post-acute from 2025-10-28 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

MEADOW CREEK POST-ACUTE in PARAMOUNT, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 28, 2025.

The nurse, identified as RNS 3, found the maggots during routine care and immediately contacted the resident's physician.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at MEADOW CREEK POST-ACUTE?
The nurse, identified as RNS 3, found the maggots during routine care and immediately contacted the resident's physician.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in PARAMOUNT, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from MEADOW CREEK POST-ACUTE or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 056166.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check MEADOW CREEK POST-ACUTE's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.