The resident, identified in inspection records as CR #1, left the facility during an afternoon shift change without staff knowledge. A nurse leaving work spotted him walking down the street toward the freeway and called the traveling director of nursing to report he had left the building.
The incident occurred on a hot day, raising concerns about dehydration and traffic safety. LVN K, who discovered the missing resident, said she turned her car around to look for him but couldn't find him initially. She had last seen him at the nursing station around 2:00 p.m.
"He could have gotten hit crossing the street or dehydrated because it was hot that day," LVN K told inspectors during an October 23 interview. She described CR #1 as incapable of signing himself out, confused and "not in his right mind."
The traveling director of nursing and the facility's director of nursing jumped in a car to search for the resident. They found him walking back toward the facility on his own.
When staff approached CR #1, he explained he had left to look for his family member's house or apartment. He realized he didn't know how to get there and was returning to the facility on his own. Staff found no injuries, and the resident appeared apologetic about leaving without telling anyone where he was going.
The traveling director of nursing said it was her last day working at the facility. She did not conduct any training sessions with staff about the incident.
During the search, the previous administrator made an announcement that CR #1 was missing and directed all available staff to look for him. LVN W searched around the building, in trash cans and the dumpster. He said the incident occurred during shift change, so he hadn't been assigned to care for CR #1 yet because the resident wasn't in the building.
CR #1's cognitive condition made the incident particularly concerning. LVN W described him as someone who "sometimes heard voices in his mind" and might have developed the idea of meeting his family member at a local business. While the resident could hold basic conversations, anything requiring deeper understanding wasn't reliable due to his cognitive impairment.
"He was cognitive enough to not injure himself or others," LVN W said, but added that CR #1 was not someone who would typically sign himself out of the building and "did not even know what that was."
The street where CR #1 walked presented significant safety hazards. Inspectors observed on October 22 at 4:45 p.m. that cars consistently drove down the street at moderate speed, with a posted limit of 45 mph. The nearby business where CR #1 was found sits close to the freeway and on the opposite side of the street from the nursing home.
Despite state requirements, the facility failed to properly report the incident. Texas regulations require nursing facilities to report missing residents to the state's Central Intake and Investigations unit immediately, but no later than 24 hours after the incident occurs or is suspected.
The administrator appeared confused about reporting requirements during interviews with inspectors. He seemed "conversational, upset, and could not understand why the facility made a big deal of it," according to inspection records. He referenced a provider letter dated August 24 and said the facility needed to report elopements within 24 hours to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission.
However, LVN W said he wasn't told the incident needed to be reported "because CR #1 walked off and then walked back to the facility." The director of nursing took over documentation of the incident.
State regulations clearly define missing resident incidents that require immediate reporting. The Long-Term Care Regulation Provider Letter dated August 29, 2024, specifies that nursing facilities must report missing residents immediately, providing an example of a resident not found in their room in the morning with a bed that appears not to have been slept in.
The provider letter emphasizes that facilities must report incidents involving missing residents regardless of the outcome, stating that such incidents fall under reportable categories that require notification within 24 hours.
The facility's failure to recognize and properly report the incident raises questions about staff training and administrative oversight. The traveling director of nursing's departure on the day of the incident, combined with the administrator's apparent confusion about reporting requirements, suggests potential gaps in facility management and regulatory compliance.
CR #1's case illustrates the vulnerability of cognitively impaired nursing home residents who may wander due to confusion or attempts to find familiar places or people. The resident's ability to leave the facility undetected during a shift change also highlights potential security and monitoring concerns.
The incident occurred near a major roadway and freeway system, where a confused elderly person could face serious injury or death from traffic. The resident's successful return to the facility on his own was fortunate, but the outcome could have been tragic given the traffic conditions and his cognitive state.
Staff members expressed genuine concern for CR #1's safety, with multiple employees participating in the search effort. However, the facility's administrative response fell short of state requirements designed to ensure proper investigation and prevention of similar incidents.
The inspection found the facility in violation of federal regulations requiring proper incident reporting and resident safety measures. The violation was classified as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Deerbrook Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center from 2025-10-27 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Deerbrook Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center
- Browse all TX nursing home inspections