The wound care nurse practitioner collected a specimen from Resident #2's right foot on October 15th after noticing increased swelling and pus drainage. Lab results showing Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus epidermidis arrived at the facility days later but weren't reported to the practitioner until October 20th.
Nobody knows why.
The Unit Manager told federal inspectors the results should have been visible immediately on the facility's Point-Click-Care system dashboard. She said they "should have been reported to the provider on the day they arrived at the facility."
The facility has a backup system specifically designed to catch these oversights. The overnight shift conducts a 24-hour chart check to identify missed labs and other critical information. But the infected wound results slipped through that safety net too.
Resident #2 had been living at the facility since earlier this year with an infected diabetic ulcer of the right foot. Federal inspectors found the resident cognitively intact, scoring 13 out of 15 on a mental status assessment, but requiring substantial assistance with most daily activities including bathing, dressing, and walking.
Contact precautions signs hung above the resident's room during the inspection, indicating infectious disease protocols were in place.
The delay had immediate consequences. Once the nurse practitioner finally saw the lab results on October 20th, orders came quickly for intravenous antibiotics and an MRI to check whether the infection had spread to the bone. Osteomyelitis, or bone infection, can lead to amputation in diabetic patients.
The facility's own policy, revised in December 2022, requires staff to "report positive culture results to the physician/practitioner, including the antibiotics to which the identified pathogen is susceptible." The policy specifically mentions that the 24-hour shift report should help nursing staff and infection control specialists identify residents with pending lab results.
Three of the bacteria found growing in the wound are particularly concerning for diabetic patients. Staphylococcus aureus can cause severe skin and soft tissue infections that spread rapidly. Enterococcus faecalis often indicates deeper tissue involvement and can be resistant to common antibiotics. Staphylococcus epidermidis, while sometimes present on normal skin, becomes dangerous in wound infections and can form biofilms that make treatment difficult.
For diabetic patients, delayed treatment of foot infections creates a cascade of complications. Poor circulation and nerve damage in diabetic feet mean infections can progress quickly from superficial wounds to deep tissue involvement, bone infection, and ultimately amputation. Every day of delay increases these risks.
The inspection team interviewed facility leadership on October 23rd, sharing their findings with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, a Corporate Consultant, and the President of Operations. None offered comments or expressed concerns about the five-day delay.
Federal inspectors classified this as a minimal harm violation affecting few residents, but the potential consequences for Resident #2 were severe. The resident's cognitive abilities remained intact throughout the ordeal, meaning they were fully aware of their worsening condition while staff failed to act on critical test results.
The facility operates under contact precautions for infectious residents, suggesting staff understood the seriousness of wound infections. Yet their own systems failed at the most basic level: getting test results to the doctor who ordered them.
Resident #2 now faces an uncertain recovery. The MRI will determine whether months of IV antibiotics can save the foot, or whether surgical intervention becomes necessary. What started as routine monitoring of a known diabetic ulcer became a race against time once staff discovered the five-day delay.
The overnight staff who missed the results during their chart checks, the day shift who didn't notice the dashboard alerts, and the managers who didn't catch the oversight all contributed to a resident's prolonged infection. In diabetic wound care, five days can mean the difference between healing and amputation.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Nans Pointe Rehabilitation and Nursing from 2025-10-23 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Nans Pointe Rehabilitation and Nursing
- Browse all VA nursing home inspections