Majestic Care of Perrysburg: Dietary Preference Failures - OH
The October 2025 inspection at Majestic Care of Perrysburg, triggered by a complaint, found that the facility failed to properly document and honor the dietary preferences of at least two residents. The deficiency was cited at a level of minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting a few residents.
Resident 32 had told staff he didn't like pork. His meal tickets reflected that. But he also didn't like beef, and that preference existed nowhere in his records. When the facility's administrator interviewed him after inspectors raised the issue, she said he mentioned only the pork restriction and didn't bring up beef. The administrator confirmed to inspectors that the beef preference was not documented anywhere, and that his meal tickets carried a notation for no pork or beef, meaning someone knew about it at some point. Where that information came from, and why it appeared on the ticket but not in his records, wasn't explained.
For Resident 54, the problem was more fundamental. No nutritional interview had been completed at all upon admission. The facility's own policy, dated August 1, 2025, required that each resident be interviewed within 72 hours of admission to determine food and meal preferences and assess nutrition status. A registered dietician was to evaluate each resident at minimum at the time of admission, at significant changes in condition, and annually. Food allergies and intolerances were to be confirmed and entered into the electronic medical record.
None of that happened for Resident 54.
The administrator's explanation for some of the confusion touched on a separate problem. She said residents sometimes believed they were being served pork when they weren't. On October 22, 2025, the day before the inspection, the facility had served turkey sausage. Residents thought it was pork sausage. The administrator offered this as context, a kind of reassurance that the food on the plate wasn't what residents feared it was.
But that framing cuts the other way. If residents can't reliably identify what they're eating, the accuracy of documented preferences matters more, not less. A resident who avoids pork for religious, cultural, or personal reasons and receives an unlabeled meat product he can't identify has not had his preference honored, regardless of what the protein actually was.
The inspection was conducted under Complaint Number 2630192. The facility's own nutrition assessment policy made the standard clear. The gap between that written standard and what inspectors found in the records was the violation.
What remains is a straightforward picture: one resident's food restriction was known well enough to appear on his meal ticket but not well enough to be documented in his chart, and another resident arrived at the facility and went through the admission process without anyone sitting down to ask him what he wanted to eat.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Majestic Care of Perrysburg from 2025-10-23 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: September 7, 2026 · Our methodology
MAJESTIC CARE OF PERRYSBURG in PERRYSBURG, OH was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 23, 2025.
The deficiency was cited at a level of minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting a few residents.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.