Skip to main content
Advertisement

Carriage Inn: Wrong Antibiotic Given to UTI Patient - OH

Healthcare Facility:

Resident #7 was started on an antibiotic after returning from the hospital, according to federal inspectors who visited the facility in October following a complaint. The facility's infection control nurse discovered the organism causing the UTI was not sensitive to the antibiotic ordered at the hospital.

Carriage Inn of Steubenville facility inspection

She completed what's called an "antibiotic time-out" and contacted the resident's physician about the mismatch. The physician wanted to continue the ineffective antibiotic anyway.

Advertisement

The infection control nurse told inspectors this particular physician was "one of the few physicians she dealt with that was not good about following the facility's ATB Stewardship program." He would often want antibiotics continued without supporting documentation confirming a resident actually had an active infection.

The physician also didn't always change antibiotics when told the prescribed medication was ineffective for treating the identified infection, she said.

The antibiotic time-out report contained a critical error. It incorrectly identified the organism causing the resident's UTI as E. coli, when Keflex would have been appropriate treatment for that specific bacteria. But the actual organism required different medication.

The physician's response to the antibiotic time-out didn't arrive until September 2, 2025 — after the antibiotic therapy had already been completed.

Federal inspectors discovered the violation while investigating an unrelated complaint at the facility. The finding represents a breakdown in the nursing home's antibiotic stewardship program, designed to ensure residents receive appropriate medication for infections.

Carriage Inn's own policy, revised in May 2023, requires implementing an antibiotic stewardship program as part of infection prevention and control. The program's purpose is optimizing infection treatment while reducing adverse events from antibiotic use.

The medical director and director of nursing are supposed to lead the stewardship program. The medical director must set standards for antibiotic prescribing practices and oversee adherence to those practices.

The infection prevention specialist is required to use expertise and data to improve antibiotic use, including tracking antibiotic starts and monitoring adherence to evidence-based criteria during infection evaluation and management.

Monitoring responsibilities include watching patient response to antibiotics and reviewing laboratory results to determine if antibiotics remain indicated or need adjustment. The policy specifically requires reviewing antibiotic orders from emergency providers for appropriateness.

The resident in this case had received the hospital-ordered antibiotic despite clear evidence it wouldn't work against the identified infection. Laboratory results showed the organism was not sensitive to the prescribed medication, yet treatment continued unchanged.

Antibiotic stewardship programs exist because inappropriate antibiotic use can lead to drug-resistant infections and unnecessary side effects. When residents receive antibiotics that won't treat their specific infection, they face prolonged illness and potential complications.

The infection control nurse's acknowledgment that the physician routinely ignored stewardship protocols suggests systemic problems beyond this single case. Her description of a physician who "would often want antibiotics continued" without proper documentation indicates a pattern of inappropriate prescribing.

The timing failure compounds the medication error. The physician's response arriving after treatment ended meant no opportunity existed to correct the ineffective therapy while the resident was still receiving it.

Federal inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. But the breakdown in antibiotic oversight represents exactly the kind of prescribing failure that stewardship programs are designed to prevent.

The case illustrates how nursing home medication safety depends on multiple systems working together — laboratory testing, infection control review, physician responsiveness, and timely communication. When any component fails, residents receive inappropriate treatment.

Resident #7's experience shows the human cost of these system breakdowns. Despite having laboratory results identifying the specific organism and knowing the prescribed antibiotic wouldn't work, the resident continued receiving ineffective medication until the course was complete.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Carriage Inn of Steubenville from 2025-10-23 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 30, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

CARRIAGE INN OF STEUBENVILLE in STEUBENVILLE, OH was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 23, 2025.

The facility's infection control nurse discovered the organism causing the UTI was not sensitive to the antibiotic ordered at the hospital.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at CARRIAGE INN OF STEUBENVILLE?
The facility's infection control nurse discovered the organism causing the UTI was not sensitive to the antibiotic ordered at the hospital.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in STEUBENVILLE, OH, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from CARRIAGE INN OF STEUBENVILLE or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 365271.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check CARRIAGE INN OF STEUBENVILLE's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.