The January 27 incident began when the nurse arrived to check the resident's blood sugar and administer insulin. According to progress notes, the resident had been "yelling throughout the shift" about his roommate's belongings on the floor and bedside table.
When the nurse explained he would receive 10 units of Humalog insulin, the resident began yelling that he was allergic to the medication. The nurse apologized and clarified she meant Admelog, a different insulin brand, but the resident continued cursing and shouting about his Humalog allergy.
The nurse attempted to show the insulin pen to the resident. He tried to grab it from her hands, then attempted to hit her. She backed away and left the room.
The resident followed her out and announced to the hallway: "That nurse hit me twice."
The nurse immediately informed the assistant director of nursing about the situation. The administrator interviewed the resident and examined his arm where he claimed he was struck, finding no bruises, swelling, abrasions or reddened areas.
The nurse was suspended pending investigation.
But the facility's response violated its own policy and federal regulations. Westport's reporting requirements, effective February 5, 2023, state that administrators must "immediately report to the State Agency, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made" when events involve alleged abuse.
The incident occurred at 1:12 p.m. on January 27. The facility's synopsis documents the report date as January 27, but fax transmission records show the actual report wasn't sent to the state agency until 10:54 a.m. the following day.
That 18-hour delay directly contradicts what the director of nursing told federal inspectors during their October visit. She stated that "abuse allegations were reported within two hours and the event for R4 would qualify as required to report in two hours because it was an allegation of abuse."
The director of nursing revealed another concerning detail about the investigation. She told inspectors that "the former administrator had taken over the investigation due to her personal relationship with the nurse."
Federal inspectors reviewed the case as part of a complaint investigation at the 180-bed facility on Forest Avenue. The resident involved was transferred to the hospital that afternoon with altered mental status, about two and a half hours after the alleged incident.
The facility's standard protocol for abuse allegations includes suspending the accused staff member, completing pain and skin assessments, conducting trauma screening through social services, and notifying the physician. While some of these steps appear to have been followed, the critical reporting timeline was missed.
The director of nursing confirmed to inspectors that any allegation of abuse triggers immediate suspension and investigation procedures. She acknowledged the two-hour reporting requirement applies to all abuse allegations, regardless of whether physical evidence is found.
The case illustrates how nursing homes sometimes struggle with the immediacy required for abuse reporting, even when they have written policies in place. Federal regulations require facilities to report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and provide investigation results to proper authorities within strict timeframes.
The resident's allegation came during what appeared to be an escalating situation involving his medical care and room conditions. Progress notes show he had been agitated throughout the shift about his roommate's belongings and became increasingly upset during the insulin administration process.
The dispute over insulin types suggests potential communication issues around the resident's medical allergies and preferences. His strong reaction to hearing "Humalog" despite the nurse's attempted clarification indicates either confusion about his medications or previous negative experiences.
The physical altercation began when the resident tried to grab the insulin pen from the nurse's hands. His subsequent attempt to hit her prompted her withdrawal from the room, but he followed her out to make his abuse allegation publicly.
The facility's investigation found no physical evidence of the alleged hitting on the resident's arm. However, the absence of visible marks doesn't eliminate the reporting requirement, which applies to all allegations regardless of evidence.
The involvement of a former administrator with a personal relationship to the accused nurse raises questions about investigative objectivity. The director of nursing's disclosure of this relationship suggests awareness that such connections could compromise the integrity of abuse investigations.
Federal inspectors classified this as a violation affecting few residents with minimal harm or potential for actual harm. However, reporting delays can have broader implications for resident safety by preventing timely state oversight and intervention.
The October inspection was conducted in response to a complaint, though the report doesn't specify whether the complaint related to this January incident or other concerns. The facility operates under state and federal oversight as part of the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Westport Rehabilitation and Nursing Center must now develop a plan of correction addressing the reporting timeline violation. The facility has not provided additional information about changes to its reporting procedures or staff training since the incident.
The case demonstrates the complexity nursing homes face when allegations arise during routine care activities, but federal requirements remain clear: suspected abuse must be reported within two hours, regardless of circumstances or relationships involved.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Westport Rehabilitation and Nursing Center from 2025-10-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Westport Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
- Browse all VA nursing home inspections