Staff D became the only nurse in the building around 2:00 am when Staff F left without authorization. Federal inspectors found Staff D then refused to provide care for residents outside her assigned area, telling administrators she was "too busy" on her side of the facility.

The resident with an autoimmune disorder that causes multiple allergies began experiencing symptoms while Staff F was still in the building. But the allergic reaction continued after Staff F's departure, and no nurse arrived in time to help.
Staff D never checked on residents in the other area of the facility. She never called for backup nursing coverage. She told investigators nobody had reported any problems to her, but acknowledged she was "too busy" to leave her assigned section.
The resident kept an EpiPen at her bedside and another was stored in the medication cart. She had administered the life-saving injection to herself many times before entering the nursing home and knew the procedure. But facility policy required nursing supervision for such emergency medications.
Inspectors discovered Staff D had not called the on-call nurse to request additional coverage despite being alone in the building for four hours until the next shift arrived at 6:00 am. When administrators asked if she had called anyone for help, she said no because Staff F had told her the assistant director of nursing had been called and nobody came.
The facility terminated Staff D following the incident. Staff F was placed on a "Do Not Return" list through the staffing agency that employed her.
The medical director wrote new orders the morning after the incident. The facility conducted a self-administration safety assessment for the resident. Administrators installed a special bell in her room that she rings only for allergic reactions and gave her the director of nursing's phone number for direct contact.
The director of nursing told inspectors they had asked Staff D multiple times whether she had gone to check on residents in the other section. Each time, she replied she had not because she was too busy with her assigned area.
When pressed about whether anyone had reported problems to her, Staff D again said no and repeated that she was too busy to respond. Administrators asked if she had called for additional help. She said no.
The resident's autoimmune condition causes frequent allergic reactions requiring immediate medical intervention. The facility's corrective action documentation stated Staff D refused to provide care for residents outside her assigned area despite being the sole nurse responsible for the entire building.
Staff F's unauthorized departure left dozens of residents without adequate nursing coverage during overnight hours when medical emergencies are most dangerous and staffing is already minimal. The inspection found this created immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to provide sufficient staffing to meet residents' needs around the clock. The facility's failure to ensure backup coverage or require Staff D to care for all residents violated these standards.
The incident highlighted broader staffing challenges at Royal Oaks. The facility relied on agency nurses to fill critical overnight positions, creating instability in care delivery. When one agency nurse left unexpectedly, the remaining nurse felt no obligation to expand her responsibilities.
The resident who self-administered the EpiPen had entered the nursing home specifically because her medical conditions required professional monitoring and intervention. Her ability to inject the medication herself likely prevented a life-threatening situation, but the facility's failure to provide nursing coverage put her at unnecessary risk.
Inspectors classified the violation as immediate jeopardy, the most serious level of harm in federal nursing home regulations. This designation indicates the facility's actions or inactions created a situation likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment or death to residents.
The resident continues to keep emergency medication at her bedside and has direct access to nursing leadership through the special communication system installed after the incident.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center from 2025-10-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
- Browse all IA nursing home inspections