Reginald P White Nursing: Transfer Chair Flip - MS
The incident unfolded when CNA #2 asked CNA #1 to help transfer a resident identified in inspection records only as Resident #1. CNA #1 agreed. The two used a Hoyer lift to move the resident, then seated them upright in a transfer chair. The chair flipped backward.
CNA #1 told inspectors during a phone interview on October 21, 2025, that Resident #1 was normally transferred with three CNAs and a nurse present. CNA #2 had told her, she said, that the protocol had recently been changed to two CNAs. It had not been changed, at least not in any documentation that governed the resident's care.
The care plan said three CNAs and a nurse. Two CNAs showed up.
That gap between what one staff member told another and what the care plan actually required is the center of what federal inspectors flagged. The facility's own leadership, in the aftermath, emphasized to staff that individualized care plans exist for a reason and that adherence to them is an expectation, not a suggestion.
The violation was cited under F0656, which covers the development and implementation of individualized care plans. Inspectors rated the level of harm as minimal harm or potential for actual harm, and noted that few residents were affected.
What inspectors did not describe in the report is what happened to Resident #1 after the chair went over. The narrative does not say whether the resident was injured, whether they required medical attention, or how long they remained on the floor or in the overturned chair before staff responded. The report is silent on all of it.
By the time state inspectors arrived at the facility on October 20, 2025, the facility had already corrected the deficiency, at least on paper. The correction had been implemented on September 5, 2025, more than six weeks before inspectors walked through the door. Inspectors confirmed through interviews and record review on October 22 that corrective actions were in place. The violation was classified as Past Non-Compliance, meaning it was resolved before the inspection began.
That classification matters because it changes what happens next. A deficiency resolved before state entry typically carries no civil monetary penalty and results in no formal enforcement action. The facility self-corrected. Inspectors validated the correction. The file closes.
What the record does not resolve is how CNA #2 came to believe the transfer protocol had changed. The inspection report does not say whether she was told this by a supervisor, whether she misread a document, whether she assumed a change had been made, or whether she simply decided two people were enough. CNA #1 took her at her word. Neither of them checked the care plan before the transfer.
The Hoyer lift itself is a mechanical device designed to reduce the physical strain of moving residents who cannot bear their own weight. It does not stabilize a chair once a resident is seated. That part depends on the people in the room and what they do next. With three CNAs and a nurse, there are four sets of hands to manage the chair, the resident, and whatever happens in the seconds after the lift is removed. With two CNAs, there are two.
Reginald P White Nursing Facility is a skilled nursing facility in Meridian, Mississippi. The inspection that surfaced this finding was a complaint inspection, meaning someone filed a complaint that prompted the state agency to investigate.
The complaint, whatever it described, led inspectors to this resident, this transfer, this chair.
The facility has since retrained staff, updated its protocols, or taken whatever corrective steps it documented to satisfy the state agency's review. Inspectors accepted those steps as sufficient. The deficiency is closed.
Resident #1 remains in the facility's care.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Reginald P White Nursing Facility from 2025-10-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: September 7, 2026 · Our methodology
REGINALD P WHITE NURSING FACILITY in MERIDIAN, MS was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 22, 2025.
The incident unfolded when CNA #2 asked CNA #1 to help transfer a resident identified in inspection records only as Resident #1.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.