Skip to main content
Advertisement

Waters of Clifty Falls: Staff Humiliated Resident - IN

Healthcare Facility:

The resident, identified as Resident C in the inspection report, told investigators on October 20 that Certified Nursing Assistant 2 "said a lot of hurtful things" to her. The comments included telling her that nobody at the facility liked her and that she was a difficult resident to take care of and roll over.

Waters of Clifty Falls, The facility inspection

Two other nursing assistants witnessed the verbal abuse and confirmed the resident's account to inspectors.

Advertisement

CNA 3 told investigators she was in the room when CNA 2 made the comments, confirming that the assistant told the resident she was difficult to care for. CNA 4 provided additional details about a separate incident where she and another staff member were providing care to Resident C when CNA 2 entered the room.

"The resident made a remark that she was easy to care for, and CNA 2 told her she was one of the most difficult people at the facility to care for," CNA 4 told inspectors.

After CNA 3 and CNA 4 left the room, CNA 2 remained behind with the resident. When the resident later turned on her call light for assistance with hygiene, CNA 2 was no longer in the room, and the resident no longer wanted to get out of bed.

The verbal abuse went beyond individual comments. According to the inspection report, CNA 2 also told the resident there were "three types of people in this facility: those that take care of themselves, those that need a little help, and like Resident C that can't do anything on their own."

Resident C, whose medical record shows she was admitted in August with diagnoses including heart failure, depression, and hypertension, reported the treatment to management. A registered nurse interviewed her on October 8 about the incidents.

During that interview, documented in facility records, the resident expressed that she was upset CNA 2 had told her she was hard to roll and that other staff members talked about her. While CNA 2 later apologized, the resident told the nurse she still felt ridiculed and embarrassed.

The facility responded by ensuring CNA 2 no longer provides care to Resident C. However, the damage to the resident's sense of dignity had already occurred.

An admission assessment from August 22 confirmed that Resident C was cognitively intact, meaning she fully understood the hurtful nature of the comments directed at her. The psychological impact of being told that staff disliked her and found her burdensome would be particularly acute for someone with depression, one of her documented diagnoses.

The inspection findings violated federal regulations requiring nursing homes to ensure residents are treated with dignity and respect. The facility's own policy, titled "Your Rights and Protections as a Nursing Home Resident," explicitly states that residents "have the right to be treated with dignity and respect."

The presence of multiple witnesses to the verbal abuse suggests the behavior occurred openly, raising questions about the facility's culture and supervision of staff interactions with vulnerable residents. That two different nursing assistants independently corroborated the resident's account demonstrates the incidents were not isolated misunderstandings but clear violations of basic human decency.

The timing of the incidents also raises concerns. The verbal abuse occurred after the resident had been at the facility for several weeks, suggesting staff had time to develop negative attitudes toward her care needs rather than approaching her with professional compassion.

Federal inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm with the potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. However, for Resident C, the psychological damage was immediate and lasting, leaving her feeling unwanted and dehumanized in what should have been a safe environment during her recovery.

The case illustrates how quickly staff attitudes can destroy a resident's sense of dignity and belonging. Despite the facility's written policies promising respectful treatment, the reality for Resident C was a nursing assistant who made her feel like a burden and told her that her caregivers disliked her.

The investigation stemmed from a complaint, suggesting either the resident or someone acting on her behalf felt compelled to report the treatment to authorities. That step required courage from someone already vulnerable and dependent on the facility for daily care.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Waters of Clifty Falls, The from 2025-10-20 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

WATERS OF CLIFTY FALLS, THE in MADISON, IN was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 20, 2025.

The comments included telling her that nobody at the facility liked her and that she was a difficult resident to take care of and roll over.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at WATERS OF CLIFTY FALLS, THE?
The comments included telling her that nobody at the facility liked her and that she was a difficult resident to take care of and roll over.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in MADISON, IN, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from WATERS OF CLIFTY FALLS, THE or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 155209.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check WATERS OF CLIFTY FALLS, THE's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.