Skip to main content
Advertisement

Princeton Manor: Resident Wandered Off During Night - CA

The incident at Princeton Manor Healthcare Center occurred between 11:30 p.m. and 2 a.m. on an unspecified date, according to federal inspection records. Resident 63, who had a documented history of elopement and was supposed to wear a wanderguard device, left the facility undetected during the night shift.

Princeton Manor Healthcare Center, LLC facility inspection

CNA 5, the nursing assistant assigned to the resident, told investigators he last saw Resident 63 at 11:30 p.m. lying on his bed with his cap on. The aide then went to his position in the hallway and became distracted by another resident who was walking around.

Advertisement

Around 1:30 a.m., LVN 8 asked the nursing assistant to escort the wandering resident back to his room. That task took him "maybe 20 minutes or less than 30 minutes," he told inspectors. When he returned around 2 a.m., he decided to check on his assigned residents.

Resident 63 was gone.

The nursing assistant immediately alerted LVN 8, and staff searched the bathroom and patio. Other nursing assistants joined the search, but the resident was nowhere to be found.

"CNA 5 acknowledged they were supposed to check the resident at least every two hours, and he should have checked Resident 63 at 1:30 a.m. and anything could have happened within the 30 minutes of not checking Resident 63," the inspection report states.

In reality, the gap was much longer. The nursing assistant had last seen the resident at 11:30 p.m. and didn't discover him missing until 2 a.m. That's two and a half hours without a safety check on a resident with known wandering behavior.

The facility's own care plan, initiated June 13, 2025, identified Resident 63 as having a "Risk for wandering/elopement." The plan called for use of a wanderguard device on his right wrist, with goals that "the resident will not leave facility unattended" and "the resident's safety will be maintained."

But the nursing assistant told investigators he didn't know if Resident 63 was wearing a wanderguard that night. No alarm sounded during the incident.

Resident 63 "used to get up and wander around from 2 a.m. to 4 a.m.," the nursing assistant said. Despite this known pattern, the facility's only interventions were "to just be alert and to check on Resident 63 at least every two hours."

That checking requirement never made it into the resident's written care plan, inspectors found. While the plan specified the wanderguard device, it "did not include checking on the resident every 2 hours by facility staff."

The nursing assistant said "only CNAs checked the residents, and the charge nurse sometimes reminded them about doing rounds." He acknowledged that "rounding every two hours was important to ensure the residents are okay, on their beds sleeping, and safe."

The facility had a policy requiring comprehensive person-centered care plans with "measurable objectives, and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs." Another policy, revised in January 2023, required the interdisciplinary team to assess residents for elopement risk and develop individualized prevention plans.

But on the night Resident 63 disappeared, the systems failed. The wanderguard either wasn't functioning or wasn't being worn. The required safety checks weren't happening. And a resident with documented wandering behavior walked out undetected.

The nursing assistant told investigators this was Resident 63's first elopement at the facility, though he had a history of wandering elsewhere. Staff confirmed the side door was always locked and they didn't use it, but the resident still managed to leave.

The inspection report doesn't indicate whether Resident 63 was found or what happened to him after he left the building. It simply documents the 2.5-hour gap when nobody was watching a man known to wander, and the moment staff realized he was gone.

Federal investigators classified the violation as causing "actual harm" to residents, affecting "few" people at the facility.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Princeton Manor Healthcare Center, LLC from 2025-10-20 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

PRINCETON MANOR HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC in OAKLAND, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 20, 2025.

The incident at Princeton Manor Healthcare Center occurred between 11:30 p.m.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at PRINCETON MANOR HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC?
The incident at Princeton Manor Healthcare Center occurred between 11:30 p.m.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in OAKLAND, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from PRINCETON MANOR HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 055876.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check PRINCETON MANOR HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.