Skip to main content
Advertisement

Encore Village: Power of Attorney Mix-Up Denied Family - IL

Healthcare Facility:

Staff at Encore Village failed to identify who held power of attorney for the resident, instead repeatedly calling the man's daughter who had explicitly told them to contact her fiancΓ©. The mix-up left the actual decision-maker uninformed about multiple falls and the resident's declining health.

Encore Village facility inspection

The resident was an elderly male admitted with moderate cognitive impairment, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and a history of falling. Federal inspectors found the facility violated regulations requiring proper implementation of advance directives and power of attorney arrangements.

Advertisement

"I am R1's power of attorney, and the facility didn't let me know about R1's condition until the day R1 passed away," the son-in-law told inspectors. "They always contact V5; nobody informed me about R1's decline or about his multiple falls."

The confusion reached a breaking point when the resident returned from a hospital stay after signing out against medical advice and taking an Uber home. The daughter, frustrated by the situation, directly asked staff why they couldn't contact her fiancΓ© who held the power of attorney.

"The daughter said she was tired of him and asked why the facility couldn't call my fiancΓ©, who has the power of attorney," the facility's nurse practitioner told inspectors.

Despite this clear direction, staff continued their pattern of miscommunication. The social services director admitted uncertainty about who actually held decision-making authority. "I am not sure who was the power of attorney for R1. I will ask the administrator about the R1's POA," the social services director said.

The administrator acknowledged the facility never obtained proper power of attorney paperwork, yet staff had been documenting the son-in-law as the power of attorney in medical records. "We never got any power of attorney (POA) paperwork. V5 is the primary contact, so we were contacting V5. It was a mistake that staff were documenting V6 as R1's POA," the administrator explained.

This created a dangerous contradiction. While the facility's own records identified the son-in-law as the power of attorney, staff consistently bypassed him for all medical decisions and updates about the resident's condition.

The administrator attempted to shift responsibility to the social services department. "The social service has the sole responsibility to have the advance directive in place for our residents," the administrator said.

Federal inspectors found no written documentation in the resident's medical record designating either the daughter or son-in-law as power of attorney. The facility's own policy requires the Social Service Director to "assess, care plan and implement Advance Directives within 30 days after admission."

The policy defines a resident representative as "a person appointed as a decisional representative that is either designated in writing by a resident to be his or her power of attorney or the resident's healthcare surrogate or guardian."

The breakdown in communication had serious consequences beyond administrative confusion. The son-in-law remained unaware of his father-in-law's multiple falls and overall decline, preventing him from making informed decisions about care. The daughter, meanwhile, grew increasingly frustrated with being contacted about decisions she wasn't authorized to make.

The incident highlights how administrative failures can isolate families from critical medical information. When the resident signed out of the hospital against medical advice and returned via Uber, it represented exactly the type of situation where proper power of attorney notification becomes crucial for resident safety and family coordination.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to honor residents' rights regarding treatment decisions and ensure proper implementation of advance directives. The failure to establish clear power of attorney procedures violated these protections designed to keep families informed and involved in care decisions.

The facility's confusion persisted even during the federal inspection, with the social services director uncertain about power of attorney arrangements months after the resident's admission. This suggests the problem extended beyond a single case to systemic issues with advance directive implementation.

The son-in-law's exclusion from medical decisions continued until the most critical moment, when staff finally contacted him on the day his father-in-law died.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Encore Village from 2025-10-14 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

πŸ₯ Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

πŸ“‹ Quick Answer

ENCORE VILLAGE in SCHAUMBURG, IL was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 14, 2025.

The mix-up left the actual decision-maker uninformed about multiple falls and the resident's declining health.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at ENCORE VILLAGE?
The mix-up left the actual decision-maker uninformed about multiple falls and the resident's declining health.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SCHAUMBURG, IL, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from ENCORE VILLAGE or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 145341.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check ENCORE VILLAGE's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.