Skip to main content
Advertisement

Cedarwood Plaza: 16-Pound Weight Loss Ignored - OH

Healthcare Facility:

Resident 104 weighed 154 pounds in February. By July 10, she had dropped to 146 pounds — an eight-pound loss that should have triggered weekly weight monitoring under facility policy at Cedarwood Plaza.

Cedarwood Plaza facility inspection

Nobody weighed her again for nearly a month.

Advertisement

When staff finally checked on August 7, the resident weighed 139 pounds. She had lost another seven pounds, bringing her total weight loss to 4.7 percent of her body weight. The facility's own policy required reweights within 48 hours for any five-pound deviation.

Five days later, the resident had a seizure and was rushed to the hospital with bradycardia, altered mental status, and septic shock from a urinary tract infection.

Corporate Lead Dietitian 651 acknowledged the weight loss "had not been addressed in a timely manner by the dietitian" during an October 9 interview with inspectors. The facility's regular dietitian was on leave of absence at the time.

The resident returned from the hospital on August 26 weighing 138 pounds. A nutrition assessment dated September 1 noted she had lost "ten percent or greater over the past six months," describing the loss as "likely related to decreased meal intakes and behaviors."

Staff recommended Magic cups — nutritional supplements — twice daily because "other supplements had been refused by the resident in the past."

Three days later, the resident became lethargic again. A nurse practitioner noted on September 4 that "nursing was reporting the resident wasn't eating well" and sent her back to the hospital due to concerns about sepsis.

This time, she was admitted to intensive care for hypothermia.

The facility's weight monitoring policy, last reviewed January 6, explicitly required dietitians to "evaluate weights and initiate appropriate interventions" and "follow up with nursing to confirm that reweights had been completed."

None of this happened for Resident 104.

Restorative Certified Nursing Assistant 440 told inspectors she had weighed the resident on July 10 using a mechanical Hoyer lift. She said "typically when a resident lost five or more pounds a resident would be put on weekly weights for closer monitoring" and that "the dietitian would be the one who would indicate if a resident should be put on weekly weights."

The dietitian never made that indication.

Director of Nursing acknowledged during her October 9 interview that "Resident 104's weight loss" was significant and that "the resident would skip meals." She confirmed the resident "should have been put on weekly weights for closer monitoring."

Medical records show Resident 104 was cognitively intact and independent for eating. Her Medicare assessment indicated she had "significant weight loss which had not been prescribed and was not on any therapeutic diet."

The resident's weight appeared to stabilize at 138-139 pounds by late August, but only after her first hospitalization and the addition of Ensure supplements twice daily. That order was discontinued when she was admitted to the hospital on August 12.

When she returned, staff tried Magic cups instead, noting in her readmission assessment that her dramatic weight loss over six months required immediate intervention to "help promote weight stability."

The pattern repeated itself within days. Despite the new supplements, the resident became lethargic and stopped eating well, prompting her second emergency hospitalization in less than a month.

Corporate Lead Dietitian 651 confirmed during his interview that monthly weights showing "five percent or more" loss should trigger a reweight, and if that reweight "still showed a significant weight loss, the dietitian would address the weight loss in a note or an assessment and normally the resident would be put on weekly weights."

For Resident 104, none of these standard procedures occurred until after her first hospitalization for sepsis.

The inspection was conducted following a complaint. Federal inspectors found the facility failed to ensure adequate nutritional status and failed to follow its own policies for monitoring residents at risk of malnutrition.

Resident 104's case illustrates how administrative gaps — a dietitian on leave, missed reweights, delayed interventions — can cascade into life-threatening medical emergencies for vulnerable nursing home residents.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Cedarwood Plaza from 2025-10-14 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

CEDARWOOD PLAZA in CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 14, 2025.

Resident 104 weighed 154 pounds in February.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at CEDARWOOD PLAZA?
Resident 104 weighed 154 pounds in February.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from CEDARWOOD PLAZA or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 365033.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check CEDARWOOD PLAZA's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.