Skip to main content
Advertisement

Silver Tree Nursing: Missing Wound Care Records - TX

Federal inspectors found Silver Tree Nursing and Rehabilitation Center violated professional documentation standards by failing to record the resident's repeated refusals of wound care from October 1 through October 6. The resident, identified as Resident #2, had an unstageable pressure injury on his right buttock that required daily treatment.

Silver Tree Nursing and Rehabilitation Center facility inspection

The 85-year-old man scored just 6 out of 15 on a cognitive assessment, indicating severe impairment. He was admitted in September with protein-calorie malnutrition and had been flagged as having "potential for pressure ulcer development" since his arrival.

Advertisement

His wound administration record showed a complete blank for nearly a week. The treatment was supposed to happen once daily during morning shifts, with flexible timing to accommodate the resident's needs. Instead, nothing was documented.

LVN AD told inspectors during an October 9 interview that the resident "had a history of refusing wound care" over the previous two weeks. Staff had to involve family members to convince him to accept treatment, she said.

RN C, who provided wound treatment on September 30, October 3, and October 6, described the daily struggle. She tried "2 or 3 times for wound treatment, but he continued to refuse wound treatment," she told inspectors October 9. Staff had to educate both the resident and his family "every day about importance of wound treatment."

The facility's own policies required documentation of all treatments on administration records. The 2021 Wound Treatment Management policy specifically stated "Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record." A separate documentation policy required "complete and accurate documentation for each resident on all appropriate clinical record sheets."

But when inspectors reviewed the records, they found nothing recorded for the six-day period when the resident refused care.

The administrator and director of nursing acknowledged the problem during an October 10 interview. They told inspectors that "Resident #2 refusing wound treatment should be documented in his administration record." They said accurate records were important for proper care.

The resident had been added to a care plan intervention specifically noting his "history of wound care refusal" on October 7 — the day after the documentation gap ended. By then, staff had already missed nearly a week of required record-keeping.

Pressure injuries can worsen rapidly without proper treatment and monitoring. The resident's wound was classified as "unstageable," meaning tissue damage extended into deeper layers and the full extent couldn't be determined. Such wounds require careful daily assessment and treatment to prevent infection and further deterioration.

The documentation failures put the resident at risk of not receiving needed care, inspectors found. When medical records contain gaps, incoming staff cannot determine what treatments were attempted, what worked, or what approaches to avoid. Family members and doctors also lack critical information about the resident's condition and response to care.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain complete medical records that follow accepted professional standards. The records must accurately reflect all care provided and document when residents refuse treatment. These requirements exist because incomplete documentation can lead to medical errors, missed treatments, and poor outcomes.

The facility's care plan showed staff recognized the resident's tendency to refuse wound care, but they failed to follow their own policies for documenting those refusals. The gap in records meant no one could track patterns in his refusal behavior or determine which approaches might be more successful.

The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint. Inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. However, the failure to maintain accurate medical records violated federal standards designed to protect all nursing home residents.

The resident's severe cognitive impairment made proper documentation even more critical. Residents with dementia and other cognitive conditions often refuse care they don't understand, making detailed records essential for developing effective care strategies and ensuring continuity when staff changes occur.

Silver Tree's documentation policies acknowledged these requirements, but the facility failed to implement them when faced with a challenging resident who consistently refused necessary wound treatment.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Silver Tree Nursing and Rehabilitation Center from 2025-10-10 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

SILVER TREE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER in SCHERTZ, TX was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 10, 2025.

The resident, identified as Resident #2, had an unstageable pressure injury on his right buttock that required daily treatment.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at SILVER TREE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER?
The resident, identified as Resident #2, had an unstageable pressure injury on his right buttock that required daily treatment.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SCHERTZ, TX, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from SILVER TREE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 676121.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check SILVER TREE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.