The wound went undetected from August 1 through September 12, when a wound nurse practitioner finally removed the brace and discovered what she documented as a "traumatic wound" caused by the medical device rubbing against the resident's lateral knee.
Federal inspectors who investigated a complaint about the facility's pressure injury prevention found that staff had no documentation of skin checks under the brace during the 42-day period, even though the resident's care plan specifically called for examining "right knee skin under immobilizer Q shift."
The resident had been ordered to wear the hinged knee brace "locked into extension at all times" with "no ROM allowed through R knee" starting August 4. An earlier order to assess skin under the brace had been discontinued August 1, just three days before the continuous wear requirement began.
When the wound nurse practitioner discovered the injury September 12, she immediately recommended daily skin checks underneath the brace and consultation with orthopedics about whether the resident could use a different brace or go without one entirely. She also ordered betadine wet-to-dry dressings and extra padding to prevent further trauma.
Two nurses told inspectors that standard practice requires assessing residents' skin before and after placement of orthopedic devices. They said skin checks should happen every four hours, or every two hours for devices worn continuously.
"Orders for assessment are usually placed but it was an expectation that skin under the devices be checked regardless of being an order or not," the nurses said.
Yet no such assessments occurred for Resident 208 during the critical six-week period.
The facility's own care plan had established the intervention: "Please check right knee skin under immobilizer Q shift. Notify MD/NP for any abnormality." But inspectors found no documentation that this intervention was followed after August 1.
The wound represented what regulators classify as an "avoidable" pressure injury, meaning the facility failed to evaluate the resident's clinical condition and risk factors, implement appropriate interventions, monitor their impact, or revise care as needed.
Federal standards require nursing homes to provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new wounds from developing. The Baltimore facility's violation affected what inspectors described as "few" residents but demonstrated a breakdown in basic skin monitoring protocols.
The injury occurred despite clear professional recommendations. When the wound nurse practitioner initially assessed the resident's skin and wounds on September 12, she noted the indentation immediately upon brace removal and classified it as trauma related to the medical device.
Her treatment recommendations were comprehensive: daily skin assessments, orthopedic consultation about alternative bracing options, wound dressings, and protective padding. These measures highlighted what should have been standard preventive care throughout the resident's brace-wearing period.
The case illustrates how medical devices meant to aid recovery can cause harm when proper monitoring fails. Knee braces and similar orthopedic equipment require vigilant skin assessment because they create pressure points and restrict air circulation, particularly when worn continuously.
Staff interviewed by inspectors demonstrated knowledge of proper protocols but failed to implement them consistently. The gap between stated expectations and actual practice left the resident vulnerable to preventable injury.
The facility's documentation gaps were stark. While orders existed for continuous brace wear, corresponding skin protection measures weren't consistently executed or recorded. The care plan intervention remained on paper without evidence of real-world implementation.
Federal inspectors completed their review October 9, three days after making the Director of Nursing aware of concerns regarding the resident's pressure injury. The complaint that triggered the investigation had specifically alleged inadequate treatment and prevention of pressure injuries.
The resident's experience demonstrates how quickly preventable wounds can develop when basic monitoring breaks down. In just over a month of missed assessments, continuous pressure from an improperly monitored medical device created trauma requiring ongoing wound care and potential equipment changes.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare Ctr from 2025-10-09 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare Ctr
- Browse all MD nursing home inspections