Federal inspectors discovered the documentation problem at Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare Center after investigating a complaint that Resident 202 wasn't being cleaned after incontinence episodes. The facility's own records showed the resident experienced incontinence on June 8, June 25, and June 27 during night shifts, yet staff marked toileting hygiene tasks as "NA" — not applicable — on those same shifts.
The Director of Nursing told inspectors that nursing assistants should document care provided and note any refusals. When presented with the contradictory records for Resident 202, the nursing director speculated the assistant "was probably trying to document that the resident refused because the resident had refusing behaviors."
But the facility's documentation system included a specific "RR" code for resident refusals. When asked whether staff should use "RR" rather than "NA" for refusals, the nursing director agreed they should if that option was available in the charting system.
The nursing assistant responsible for the documentation gave a different explanation. GNA 18 told inspectors that "NA" indicated when "the care or task does not apply to the resident." When confronted about marking toileting hygiene as not applicable on nights when Resident 202 had documented incontinence, the assistant said "they meant to document RR but were unable to so they documented NA."
The documentation failures occurred over a three-week period in June. On June 8, facility records showed Resident 202 experienced both bladder and bowel incontinence during the night shift. The same pattern repeated on June 25 and June 27 — documented incontinence episodes paired with "not applicable" hygiene care notations.
Medical records serve as the primary evidence of care delivery in nursing homes. When staff document that hygiene care doesn't apply to a resident who experienced incontinence, it creates a false picture of what happened during that shift. The records provide no indication whether the resident was actually cleaned, refused care, or was left in soiled conditions.
The complaint that triggered the October 7 inspection specifically alleged that Resident 202 wasn't being cleaned after incontinence episodes. The documentation review revealed a pattern where night shift records failed to accurately reflect what care was provided or attempted.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain medical records that meet accepted professional standards. Accurate documentation protects residents by ensuring care needs are communicated between shifts and provides evidence that required care was delivered.
The nursing director's suggestion that the assistant was trying to document refusals highlights another problem — if Resident 202 was consistently refusing hygiene care after incontinence, that pattern should have triggered interventions to address the underlying issue. Residents who refuse necessary hygiene care may need different approaches, timing adjustments, or clinical assessment.
GNA 18's explanation that they "meant to document RR but were unable to" raises questions about staff training on the documentation system. If nursing assistants don't understand how to properly record care refusals, similar documentation errors could be occurring with other residents and other types of care.
The inspection found the documentation problem affected one resident out of 18 reviewed during the complaint survey. But the systematic nature of the errors — occurring consistently over multiple shifts and involving the same type of care — suggests deeper issues with record-keeping practices.
Resident 202's case illustrates how documentation failures can obscure whether vulnerable residents receive basic hygiene care. When someone experiences incontinence and staff mark hygiene care as "not applicable," family members and other caregivers have no way to know from the medical record whether their loved one was properly cleaned.
The facility must now develop a plan to correct the deficient record-keeping practices. But for Resident 202, the June documentation gaps mean there's no reliable record of whether they received appropriate hygiene care during multiple incontinence episodes — a basic dignity issue that should never be left to guesswork in a professional healthcare setting.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare Ctr from 2025-10-09 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare Ctr
- Browse all MD nursing home inspections