The fabricated entry at Scioto Rehabilitation & Care Center documented a temperature of 97.6 degrees, pulse of 66 beats per minute, and respiration of 18 breaths per minute for Resident 70 on a day when that person was no longer at the facility. The registered nurse also noted the resident was "alert and easily aroused" and provided extensive details about their orientation, mobility, and bladder function.

Resident 70 had left for a physician appointment and never returned, officially discharging on the earlier date. Yet the nursing progress note, timestamped at 2:57 p.m., described taking the person's vital signs using a forehead thermometer and conducting a comprehensive health evaluation.
The Director of Nursing confirmed to inspectors that the resident "had not returned to the facility after a physician appointment" and acknowledged the nursing note was "not accurate since Resident 70 had not been at the facility" for three days.
A second case involved missing documentation that should have been in another resident's medical record. Resident 50, who had multiple serious conditions including diabetes, dementia, and severe pressure ulcers, was seen by an outside wound consultant. The facility's progress notes indicated a Wound Nurse Practitioner assessed this resident's pressure ulcers, but no record of that visit existed in the medical chart.
Resident 50 had significant care needs, requiring substantial assistance with transfers and total dependence for toilet hygiene and bathing. The person had both an unstageable pressure ulcer and a stage 3 pressure ulcer on admission, along with a venous arterial ulcer. The most recent cognitive assessment showed moderate impairment, with a score of 8 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status.
The Assistant Director of Nursing told inspectors that Resident 50 was indeed seen by the wound consultant, and that "assessment and treatment recommendations" were provided. However, the visit documentation "was never received from them to upload into this resident's chart."
The assistant director acknowledged the missing documentation "should have been received and uploaded to make Resident 50's medical record complete and accurate."
Federal regulations require nursing homes to maintain complete and accurate medical records for all residents. These records serve as the foundation for care planning, treatment decisions, and communication between healthcare providers. When staff create false entries or fail to maintain complete documentation, they compromise the integrity of the medical record system that protects vulnerable residents.
The falsified vital signs entry for Resident 70 represents a particularly serious violation because it created the appearance of ongoing care and monitoring when none occurred. The detailed assessment included observations about the resident's alertness, orientation, mobility, and bodily functions — all impossible to determine for someone who wasn't present.
For Resident 50, the missing wound consultant documentation meant the medical record lacked important information about pressure ulcer treatment and recommendations. Given this resident's multiple serious wounds and cognitive impairment, complete documentation was essential for ensuring continuity of care.
The inspection occurred in response to a complaint, suggesting someone reported concerns about the facility's record-keeping practices. Federal inspectors classified the violations as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents.
Both cases highlight systemic problems with medical record accuracy at the 433 Obetz Road facility. Staff either deliberately falsified documentation or failed to ensure important clinical information reached patient charts. The Director of Nursing's acknowledgment that the vital signs entry was inaccurate suggests awareness of the problem at the management level.
Resident 70's case raises questions about how often staff might be creating fictional medical entries. The nurse who documented the impossible vital signs and health assessment either made a serious error or deliberately falsified the record. Neither explanation inspires confidence in the facility's documentation practices.
The missing wound consultant report for Resident 50 demonstrates another failure in the medical record system. Despite having serious pressure ulcers requiring specialized care, this resident's chart lacked documentation of an expert assessment that actually occurred.
These documentation failures occurred at a facility caring for residents with complex medical needs, including dementia, diabetes, pressure ulcers, and mobility limitations. Accurate medical records are essential for tracking their conditions and ensuring appropriate treatment.
The inspection findings suggest broader problems with oversight and quality control in the facility's medical record system. When nurses can document vital signs for discharged residents and important clinical consultations disappear from charts, the entire documentation process lacks adequate safeguards.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Scioto Rehabilitation & Care Center from 2025-10-09 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Scioto Rehabilitation & Care Center
- Browse all OH nursing home inspections