Staff A continued spraying the resident's back for 10 to 15 seconds on June 9 while two other aides watched, according to federal inspection records from Accura Healthcare of Marshalltown. The facility didn't suspend the aide or begin an investigation until June 17 — eight days after the incident.
The resident, identified only as Resident #1, had severely impaired cognition with a mental status score of 4 out of 15. Medical records showed diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anxiety disorder. The patient required substantial assistance with showering.
Staff C, who witnessed the abuse, described the scene to federal inspectors in October. She said Resident #1 became aggressive while she put away towels in the shower room. When she heard the resident yelling, she turned around and saw Staff A spraying him with cold water.
"Staff B and her told Staff A not to do that because it was rude, but she continued spraying his back for 10-15 seconds," Staff C told inspectors. "She stated Resident #1 yelled, screamed, and told her to stop, as Staff A laughed."
The resident grabbed the shower head and banged it against the wall after being sprayed.
But nobody reported the incident immediately.
Staff B, the other witness, explained during an October phone interview that she would have reported it sooner, but she was new to the facility. Staff C was also present, she noted, suggesting shared responsibility for reporting.
Staff A worked her regular shifts on June 13, 14, and 15 — caring for other vulnerable residents while the abuse allegation went unreported. Employment records show she had access to residents for nearly a week after witnesses saw her spray the dementia patient with cold water.
The facility's own abuse prevention policy, updated in October 2022, required immediate action when staff suspected abuse, including suspending the employee to prevent further potential harm. Federal inspectors found no documentation that administrators separated Staff A from residents or began investigating before June 17.
The delay came to light only when someone finally reported the incident on June 17 at 5 p.m. A health status note from that day indicated a staff member reported that around 11:45 a.m. on June 9, another staff member had said "watch this" before spraying Resident #1 with cold water.
The facility terminated Staff A that same day. An employee corrective action form dated June 17 documented that two certified nurse aides witnessed Staff A intentionally spray a resident with cold water, identifying the action as a direct violation of facility policy.
The administrator explained the facility's standard protocol during an October 9 interview with inspectors. If staff reported abuse, he said, he would suspend the alleged abuser, conduct a formal investigation, and report to the state agency within two hours.
"He explained the situation with Resident #1; he reported it to the SA when he found out," inspection records show. "He stated the witnesses didn't realize it was abuse but there should have been no question."
Federal inspectors disagreed with the suggestion that witnesses might not recognize intentional cold water spraying as abuse. The facility's 46 residents included many with cognitive impairments and physical dependencies that made them vulnerable to mistreatment.
The inspection, conducted in response to a complaint, found the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse and separate an alleged perpetrator from residents in a timely manner. Inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm.
Staff A's termination came only after an eight-day period during which she continued working with residents while the abuse allegation remained unreported and uninvestigated. The facility provided no documentation showing they took any protective measures during those intervening days.
The case illustrates a common problem in nursing home abuse investigations: delayed reporting that allows alleged perpetrators continued access to vulnerable residents. Staff C witnessed another employee spraying a dementia patient with cold water for more than 10 seconds while the resident screamed, yet the incident went unreported for over a week.
Resident #1's severe cognitive impairment — scoring just 4 out of 15 on a standard mental status assessment — made him particularly vulnerable to abuse and less able to report mistreatment himself. His diagnoses of multiple forms of dementia and anxiety disorder required careful, compassionate care during personal hygiene tasks like showering.
Instead, Staff A turned the routine care into what witnesses described as cruel treatment, spraying cold water on the resident's back while he yelled for her to stop. Her laughter during the resident's distress particularly troubled the witnesses, who told her the behavior was rude but didn't immediately report it as abuse.
The facility's abuse prevention policy explicitly required measures to prevent further potential abuse, such as suspending employees under investigation. Yet Staff A worked regular shifts on June 13, 14, and 15, providing direct care to residents while the June 9 incident remained unreported.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to immediately report suspected abuse to administrators and state agencies, then investigate promptly to protect residents from further harm. The eight-day delay at Accura Healthcare violated these fundamental protections.
The administrator's comment that witnesses "didn't realize it was abuse" but "there should have been no question" highlighted the facility's failure to train staff to recognize and report mistreatment. Two certified nurse aides watched a colleague intentionally spray a vulnerable dementia patient with cold water, told her it was rude, but didn't understand their obligation to report potential abuse immediately.
Resident #1's response — grabbing the shower head and banging it against the wall — demonstrated the distress caused by Staff A's actions. The patient's severe cognitive impairment made verbal complaints difficult, but his physical reaction clearly showed the cold water spraying caused significant upset.
The termination of Staff A on June 17 came only after someone finally reported the week-old incident. By then, she had worked four additional shifts with access to the facility's 46 residents, many of whom shared Resident #1's cognitive impairments and physical vulnerabilities.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Accura Healthcare of Marshalltown from 2025-10-09 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Accura Healthcare of Marshalltown
- Browse all IA nursing home inspections