Federal inspectors documented the pattern at Fair Oaks Health & Rehabilitation during a complaint investigation in October. Resident #6, who requires staff assistance to move in bed and has severe cognitive impairment, had his call bell clipped to the bottom sheet more than halfway down his bed — completely out of reach.
The violation occurred repeatedly over 48 hours. On October 6, inspectors observed the resident sitting up and lying in bed at 11:17 a.m. and 4:17 p.m. with his call bell inaccessible. The pattern continued the next morning: at 8:01 a.m. and again at 8:21 a.m., the call bell remained clipped far down the bed.
At 8:21 a.m. on October 7, a registered nurse entered the resident's room, stood beside him, and spoke to him directly. The nurse left without moving the call bell within reach.
According to the resident's most recent quarterly assessment, he suffers from severe cognitive impairment and has range of motion limitations in both arms. He cannot reposition himself in bed without staff assistance — making access to emergency communication critical for his safety.
"A resident's call bell should be placed within a resident's reach at all times," certified nursing assistant #2 told inspectors during an interview on October 7. "This was for the resident's safety in case he needed to call a staff member."
The unit manager, a licensed practical nurse, echoed this understanding during her interview the following morning. She explained that keeping call bells within reach "is the quickest way for a resident to alert staff if he/she needs assistance."
Both staff members articulated the correct safety protocol. Yet neither the registered nurse who visited Resident #6's room nor any other staff member corrected the dangerous placement over the two-day period inspectors observed.
Fair Oaks Health's own policy explicitly addresses this requirement. The facility's "Answering the Call Light" policy states: "When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident."
The policy further commits the facility to "maintain a functional call light system and will make all reasonable efforts to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs."
For Resident #6, the system was neither functional nor accessible.
The violation takes on particular significance given the resident's documented disabilities. His severe cognitive impairment means he may not understand why he cannot reach help. His arm mobility restrictions mean he cannot compensate by stretching or repositioning himself to reach the call bell.
This combination — cognitive impairment paired with physical limitations — creates exactly the scenario that call bell policies are designed to prevent. A resident who needs help but cannot ask for it.
Federal inspectors observed this pattern across multiple shifts, suggesting the problem was not a single oversight but a systemic failure. The morning nurse's interaction with Resident #6 on October 7 demonstrates that staff were aware of his presence and needs, yet failed to ensure his most basic safety requirement.
When inspectors raised these concerns on October 8, they spoke directly with the facility's top leadership: the administrator, director of nursing, and regional director of clinical operations. All three were informed of the call bell violations at 10:55 a.m.
The inspection report notes that "no additional information was provided prior to exit," indicating the facility offered no explanation for why a resident with documented cognitive and mobility impairments was left unable to summon help for two consecutive days.
The violation was classified as causing "minimal harm or potential for actual harm" — but for Resident #6, the potential consequences of being unable to call for assistance could have been severe. A fall, medical emergency, or other crisis would have left him unable to alert staff.
The case illustrates how seemingly minor oversights can compound into serious safety risks for nursing home residents with multiple disabilities. When cognitive impairment prevents a resident from advocating for himself and physical limitations prevent self-correction, proper call bell placement becomes a critical lifeline.
For Resident #6, that lifeline was cut for 48 hours while staff who knew better walked past his bed.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Fair Oaks Health & Rehabilitation from 2025-10-08 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Fair Oaks Health & Rehabilitation
- Browse all VA nursing home inspections