Skip to main content
Advertisement

Broward Oaks: Unsecured Catheter, Infection Risk - FL

The resident's urinary catheter hung loose and unsecured, moving freely each time he shifted position. His urine appeared pinkish and cloudy with visible sediment in the tubing.

Broward Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation facility inspection

When inspectors asked the nursing assistant why she kept the same contaminated gloves throughout the entire procedure, she did not respond.

Advertisement

Staff I, a certified nursing assistant who regularly cared for Resident #3, told inspectors the catheter's securing system was "sometimes" attached. When it came loose, she said, "Nurses do that" when asked if she would reattach it herself. She claimed she always reported detached catheters to nursing staff.

The resident contradicted her account. When inspectors asked if nurses had attached the securing device to his thigh, he responded, "No."

A second observation the following day at 1:30 PM revealed the same catheter remained unsecured and dangling. Staff F, a restorative nursing assistant, was providing care during this visit.

The resident also told inspectors that staff members did not wash their hands before providing urinary care.

Licensed Practical Nurse Staff J admitted to inspectors at 2:45 PM that she had not yet provided catheter care to Resident #3 during her shift, which began at 7:00 AM. She planned to complete the care "a few minutes before I go home" at 3:00 PM.

She had not assessed the color or consistency of the resident's urine. "I have not done it yet," she told inspectors.

Treatment records showed staff failed to secure the catheter on September 24 and September 26 during day shifts, despite physician orders requiring the procedure.

The facility's care plan revealed a seven-day delay in initiating catheter care protocols. A physician ordered the urinary catheter for Resident #3 on August 4, but nursing staff did not begin catheter care procedures until August 11.

The care plan also lacked evidence-based practice interventions for urinary catheter management.

On October 7, the first day of the federal inspection, a physician prescribed Cefdinir antibiotic capsules for Resident #3 at 3:08 PM. The 300-milligram capsules were ordered twice daily for seven days to treat a urinary tract infection.

Another licensed practical nurse, Staff B, described the facility's catheter care protocols during an interview. She said catheters should be flushed as ordered and that she followed facility policies for catheter management.

"The urinary catheter care is done by staff, and I must perform them for my assigned residents," she told inspectors.

Staff B said she monitored residents for urinary tract infection symptoms including confusion and complaints of burning. She claimed the facility did not wait for fever to develop before investigating potential infections.

She described monitoring urine color and consistency, encouraging adequate fluid intake, and checking catheters frequently during her shifts.

The inspection findings painted a different picture. Records showed inconsistent catheter securement, delayed care protocols, and contaminated care procedures that likely contributed to Resident #3's infection.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to prevent infections and maintain sanitary conditions during personal care. The facility's failures in basic catheter management created conditions that put the resident at risk for serious complications.

Urinary tract infections in catheterized nursing home residents can lead to sepsis, kidney damage, and death if left untreated. Proper catheter securement prevents trauma to the urethra and reduces infection risk, while hand hygiene and glove changes during care procedures are fundamental infection control measures.

The resident's pinkish, cloudy urine with sediment indicated an active infection requiring immediate antibiotic treatment. The physician's prescription on the inspection's first day suggested the infection had progressed to a point requiring medical intervention.

Resident #3 experienced the consequences of multiple care failures: unsecured medical equipment, contaminated care procedures, delayed assessments, and inadequate monitoring by nursing staff responsible for his daily care.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Broward Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation from 2025-10-08 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

BROWARD OAKS NURSING AND REHABILITATION in PLANTATION, FL was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 8, 2025.

The resident's urinary catheter hung loose and unsecured, moving freely each time he shifted position.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at BROWARD OAKS NURSING AND REHABILITATION?
The resident's urinary catheter hung loose and unsecured, moving freely each time he shifted position.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in PLANTATION, FL, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from BROWARD OAKS NURSING AND REHABILITATION or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 105237.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check BROWARD OAKS NURSING AND REHABILITATION's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.