Westwood Village Nursing: Resident Hit on Patio - IL
The inspection, completed October 3, 2025, was triggered by a complaint. What inspectors found was a physical altercation between two female residents on the facility patio, a dispute that the staff's own documentation traced back to a cigarette.
The resident who was hit, identified in inspection records only as R1, described it plainly when an inspector asked. She said R2 had struck her on the left cheek.
That account matched what staff had already written down. A progress note entered for R2 on September 27, 2025, at 7:00 PM, recorded as a late entry the following morning at 12:09 AM, documented that R2 had been involved in a physical altercation with another female resident on the patio, over a cigarette. The staff member who wrote it knew what had happened. They wrote it down. The question inspectors were there to answer was whether the facility had done anything meaningful about it.
Westwood Village's own abuse prevention policy, dated February 7, 2017, states that the facility affirms the right of residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff, and mistreatment. It states that the facility prohibits all of those things. The policy defines physical abuse as the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and that requires medical attention. It lists examples: hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment.
Being struck on the cheek by another person is not an accident. The policy the facility wrote for itself said so.
Federal inspectors cited the facility under F0600, the regulation governing the right of residents to be free from abuse. The level of harm was listed as minimal harm or potential for actual harm, and the number of residents affected was listed as few. In the language of federal nursing home oversight, that language sits at the lower end of the severity scale. It does not mean nothing happened. It means inspectors determined that what happened caused limited harm, or could have caused more.
What it does not capture is what it is like to be a person living in a nursing home and to be hit in the face on the patio.
Nursing homes are not, by their nature, places where residents can simply leave if they feel unsafe. The people who live in them are there because they need care they cannot provide for themselves. They sleep in the building. They eat in the building. They share the patio with the people who have hurt them. When an altercation happens between two residents, the facility's obligation is not just to document it after the fact but to have systems in place that prevent it, and to respond to it in ways that protect everyone involved.
The progress note in this case was entered late. The altercation happened on the evening of September 27. The note was recorded as a late entry at 12:09 AM on September 28. That kind of documentation gap is worth noting, not because late entries are automatically a sign of wrongdoing, but because the timing of documentation in abuse cases matters. What staff knew, when they knew it, and what they did next are the questions that determine whether a facility is actually protecting its residents or simply generating paperwork after harm has already occurred.
The inspection record does not describe what medical attention, if any, R1 received after being struck. It does not say whether the two residents were separated after the incident, or whether any changes were made to how they were supervised on the patio. It does not describe what the facility's response looked like in the days between the altercation and the inspection. What it contains is the resident's own words, a late-entered staff note, and a policy that the facility had written for itself and then, on at least this occasion, failed to make real.
Westwood Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is located in Chicago. The inspection that produced this citation was a complaint inspection, meaning someone, a resident, a family member, a staff member, or a member of the public, contacted regulators because they believed something had gone wrong. Complaint inspections do not happen automatically. They happen because someone decided to make a call.
The facility's abuse policy runs to several paragraphs of definitions and affirmations. It covers physical abuse, mental abuse, sexual assault, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. It states, in the language organizations use when they want to signal that they take something seriously, that the facility affirms the right of residents to be free from all of it. Policies like this one exist in binders and in electronic records systems at nursing homes across the country. They are reviewed during inspections. They are cited back to facilities when something goes wrong. They are, in that sense, a form of self-indictment. The facility wrote down what it promised. The inspection record shows what happened instead.
R1 is a person living in a nursing home in Chicago. At some point on the evening of September 27, 2025, she was sitting or standing on the patio, and another resident struck her on the left cheek. She told an inspector about it when asked. She used plain language. She said she was hit.
That is the center of this inspection record, and it is easy to lose it inside the regulatory language, the form numbers, the late-entry timestamps, and the policy citations. A woman was hit in the face. She lives in a place that promised her she would not be.
The inspection was assigned event ID 146149. The citation was for F0600. The level of harm was minimal. The number of residents affected was few.
R1 still lives there.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Westwood Vlge Nrsg and Rhb Ctr from 2025-10-03 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: September 10, 2026 · Our methodology
WESTWOOD VLGE NRSG AND RHB CTR in CHICAGO, IL was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 3, 2025.
The inspection, completed October 3, 2025, was triggered by a complaint.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.