Oaks On Parkwood: Behavioral Health Gaps - AL

The incident happened on May 4, 2024. CNA #16 was on the 3-to-11 shift with NAT #17 when she witnessed NAT #17 verbally abuse Resident #137. She did not report it that night. She did not report it the next morning. She came back to work the following day and said nothing. NAT #17 came back too, clocking in on May 4th, May 5th, and May 6th, each time arriving around 3 in the afternoon and leaving just before 11 at night.

Nobody had said a word.

It was not until May 7, 2024, that CNA #16 finally told someone what she had seen. By then, three full shifts had passed with NAT #17 working the facility unreported and unsuspended.

Federal inspectors from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services arrived at Oaks on Parkwood on September 28, 2025, responding to a complaint. What they found when they reviewed the timecards and interviewed staff was a straightforward sequence of failure: abuse witnessed, abuse concealed, and a resident left unprotected while the person who had harmed her kept showing up for work.

The executive director, interviewed on September 25, 2025, acknowledged the problem plainly. He said CNA #16 should have reported the abuse immediately. He said that if any time had lapsed between the witnessed abuse and the report, the facility was not in compliance. He said the obligation was to keep the resident safe and ensure effective reporting.

He was right about all of it. His facility had done none of it.

The timeline took some untangling. In an initial interview, the executive director described the incident as occurring the night before CNA #16 came forward on May 7th, which would have placed it on May 6th. But inspectors pulled the timecards. CNA #16 had not worked on May 6th. She had worked on May 4th, the 3-to-11 shift, alongside NAT #17. That was the only date in that stretch when both employees were on the clock together. The executive director, in a follow-up interview at 6:05 in the evening on September 25th, said he had reviewed the timecards again and should have checked them more closely. He confirmed the incident had to have occurred on May 4th.

That correction matters. It means the gap between the witnessed abuse and the report was not one night. It was three days.

During those three days, NAT #17 worked eight-hour evening shifts on May 4th, 5th, and 6th. Resident #137 was in that building. Other residents were in that building. NAT #17 had been hired by the facility on February 21, 2024, and had completed abuse training six days later, on February 27th. The training had not translated into anything that stopped what happened to Resident #137, and the silence that followed meant no one in a position of authority knew to intervene.

NAT #17 was eventually suspended on May 7, 2024, the same day CNA #16 finally came forward, and terminated on May 14th. The suspension notice cited a violation of abuse policy, inappropriate and unprofessional behavior toward a resident.

The consequence for CNA #16 was a one-on-one conversation. The Director of Nursing sat down with her and talked about the obligation to report abuse. That was it.

The inspectors classified the violation under federal tag F0607, which covers the requirement that facilities protect residents from abuse and ensure that anyone who witnesses abuse reports it immediately. The level of harm was listed as minimal harm or potential for actual harm. A few residents were identified as affected.

What the inspection report does not say, because inspection reports rarely do, is what those three days were like for Resident #137. Whether she knew the person who had verbally abused her was still coming through the door each evening. Whether she said anything to anyone, or whether she had the capacity to. Whether she was afraid.

The report does not say any of that. It says NAT #17 clocked in at 2:51 PM on May 4th, 2:59 PM on May 5th, and 2:57 PM on May 6th. It says CNA #16 knew what had happened and came to work anyway.

The executive director, to his credit, did not argue with the inspectors' conclusions. He agreed that the delay put residents at risk. He agreed his facility fell short. What he could not explain, and what the inspection report does not attempt to explain, is why a person who watched a resident get abused decided, for three consecutive days, that it was not yet time to say something.

The facility's own abuse training, completed by NAT #17 less than three months before the incident, did not prevent the abuse. CNA #16's training, whatever it included, did not produce an immediate report. The mechanism that exists to protect residents from people who harm them, which depends entirely on staff telling someone when they see something wrong, broke down at the moment it was needed.

Resident #137 was not identified by name in the inspection report. Neither was CNA #16 or NAT #17. The report offers no detail about what the verbal abuse consisted of, how loud it was, or whether other residents heard it. It offers timecards and interview summaries and a termination date.

What it establishes, without ambiguity, is that someone hurt a resident at Oaks on Parkwood on the evening of May 4, 2024, and the person who saw it happen went home, came back the next day, and kept quiet.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Oaks On Parkwood Skilled Nursing Facility from 2025-09-28 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

• View all inspection reports for Oaks On Parkwood Skilled Nursing Facility
• Browse all AL nursing home inspections