Skip to main content
Advertisement

Otterbein Monclova: Infection Control Failures - OH

Healthcare Facility:

The facility's Director of Nursing and Licensed Practical Nurse #200 also failed to wear required protective gowns while caring for Resident #16, who was under enhanced barrier precautions following surgical drainage of a scrotal abscess in August.

Otterbein Monclova facility inspection

Inspectors observed the violation during wound care on September 26. LPN #200 assisted with the procedure while wearing only protective gloves, touching the resident's tray tables, sheets, and bed. She then reached into a bottle of Iodoform gauze with the same contaminated gloves and pulled out sterile dressing material, which she handed to the Director of Nursing.

Advertisement

The Director of Nursing packed the Iodoform directly into Resident #16's surgical wound using a cotton swab, completing the entire procedure without either nurse wearing the required protective gowns.

Resident #16 had been admitted to the 55-bed facility in October 2020 following a stroke that left him with paralysis on one side of his body. He also had epilepsy and scrotal cellulitis. Hospital records from August 15 show surgeons performed an exploration of his scrotum, draining a large abscess and removing dead tissue before packing the wound with wet-to-dry Iodoform gauze.

A physician's order from February required staff to wear gloves and gowns when providing treatment or care to Resident #16 under enhanced barrier precautions. Another order from September 25 specified daily packing of the wound with Iodoform gauze strips for 20 days.

The facility had posted the required warning sign on Resident #16's door frame. The white magnetic sign displayed "EBP" at the top with pictures showing proper handwashing technique, a protective gown, and gloves.

When inspectors interviewed both nurses immediately after the wound care procedure, the Director of Nursing and LPN #200 acknowledged they had failed to wear gowns. They also confirmed they had not maintained proper infection control by using the same gloves to touch contaminated surfaces and handle clean wound dressing materials without washing their hands or changing gloves between tasks.

The facility's own policy, last revised in August 2022, specifically requires enhanced barrier precautions for residents with wounds. The policy states that hand washing, gloves, and gowns should be worn during high-contact resident care, which explicitly includes wound care for any skin opening requiring a dressing.

The policy also requires signage at room entrances to alert staff and visitors to consult with nurses before entering, so they can receive proper instruction on personal protective equipment requirements.

Resident #16 remained cognitively intact throughout his stay, according to his most recent assessment, meaning he was likely aware of the infection control failures during his daily wound care. His surgical wound required careful handling to prevent complications as the deep scrotal tissue healed from the August drainage procedure.

The contamination occurred during a procedure that required direct contact with an open surgical site in an area already prone to bacterial infection. Scrotal wounds present particular infection risks due to their location and the difficulty of maintaining sterile conditions during healing.

Federal inspectors determined the infection control violations caused minimal harm but created potential for actual harm to Resident #16. The failures occurred despite clear physician orders, posted warning signs, and the facility's own written policies requiring protective equipment and sterile technique.

The investigation stemmed from a complaint filed against the facility. Inspectors reviewed medical records for three residents with wounds but found violations affecting only Resident #16's care.

Both nurses involved in the September 26 wound care procedure held positions requiring knowledge of basic infection control principles. The Director of Nursing oversees all clinical care at the facility, while Licensed Practical Nurse #200 provides direct patient care under supervision.

The facility failed to follow its own isolation precautions process, which was designed to prevent exactly this type of cross-contamination during wound care procedures for vulnerable residents.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Otterbein Monclova from 2025-09-26 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

OTTERBEIN MONCLOVA in MONCLOVA, OH was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 26, 2025.

Inspectors observed the violation during wound care on September 26.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at OTTERBEIN MONCLOVA?
Inspectors observed the violation during wound care on September 26.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in MONCLOVA, OH, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from OTTERBEIN MONCLOVA or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 366361.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check OTTERBEIN MONCLOVA's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.