Skip to main content
Advertisement

Harcourt Terrace: Worker Fired for Rough Treatment - IN

The September 15 incident at Harcourt Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation involved Resident B, who has dementia with behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, generalized anxiety disorder, and hearing loss. The resident routinely refused medications and services, requiring staff to redirect her and offer alternative caregivers when needed.

Harcourt Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation facility inspection

QMA 1 had taken the resident for a shower that evening and brought her back to her room by having her sit on the seat of her rollator walker while pushing her down the hallway. Once in the room, the aide began loudly commanding the resident to "get up, get up, get up" so she could put her to bed.

Advertisement

LPN 6 heard the commotion and arrived at the doorway to find QMA 1 attempting to transfer the resident to bed. The licensed practical nurse immediately recognized that the aide was being rough with the patient.

When the resident refused to stand up from her walker, QMA 1 lifted her up by placing both arms under the resident's armpits and placed her on the bed. The LPN told the aide there was a better way to help the resident and ordered her to step out of the room while she finished the transfer properly.

The aide later acknowledged the incident during questioning, confirming she had pushed the resident back from the shower room while the patient sat on her walker seat and that she lifted the resident by the armpits when she wouldn't stand. QMA 1 also confirmed that LPN 6 told her she had been rough with the resident and took over the care.

The facility's clinical support nurse explained that QMA 1 was terminated because she failed to understand that Resident B should not have been placed in bed when she refused to get up from her walker. While administrators determined the aide's actions weren't abusive, they constituted a violation of the resident's rights to dignity and respect.

Resident B's care plan specifically outlined her tendency to refuse care and medications, with interventions calling for staff to offer alternative caregivers and redirect her as needed. Her hearing loss required staff to face her when speaking, get her attention before talking, speak clearly, and adjust their tone appropriately.

The facility's resident rights policy explicitly states that residents have the right to be treated with consideration, respect, and recognition of their dignity and individuality. It also guarantees residents the right to refuse any treatment or service, including medication.

The incident was reported through the facility's internal reporting system on September 22, a week after it occurred. An employee communication form dated September 19 documented QMA 1's termination for violating resident rights related to disregarding resident safety.

The case illustrates how facilities must balance providing necessary care with respecting residents' autonomy, particularly for patients with dementia who may resist assistance. When Resident B refused to stand from her walker, the appropriate response would have been to use alternative transfer techniques or seek assistance from other staff members trained in working with resistant residents.

The facility's care plans acknowledged Resident B's behavioral challenges and hearing difficulties, requiring staff to adapt their communication style and approach. The aide's loud commands and forceful lifting directly contradicted these individualized care requirements.

LPN 6's intervention prevented the situation from escalating further and ensured the resident received appropriate care. The licensed nurse's willingness to step in and correct the aide's technique demonstrates the importance of clinical oversight in protecting vulnerable residents.

The termination occurred within four days of the incident, suggesting the facility took swift action once the violation was identified and investigated. However, the delay between the September 15 incident and the September 22 reporting raises questions about how quickly concerning behaviors are flagged within the facility's supervision structure.

For residents with dementia and communication deficits like Resident B, refusal of care often stems from confusion, fear, or discomfort rather than deliberate defiance. Effective dementia care requires patience, gentle redirection, and techniques that preserve dignity while ensuring safety.

The case underscores the critical need for proper training in dementia care techniques and resident rights compliance, particularly for staff members who provide direct patient care during vulnerable moments like bathing and bedtime routines.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Harcourt Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation from 2025-09-23 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 7, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

HARCOURT TERRACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION in INDIANAPOLIS, IN was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 23, 2025.

The resident routinely refused medications and services, requiring staff to redirect her and offer alternative caregivers when needed.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at HARCOURT TERRACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION?
The resident routinely refused medications and services, requiring staff to redirect her and offer alternative caregivers when needed.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in INDIANAPOLIS, IN, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from HARCOURT TERRACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 155149.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check HARCOURT TERRACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.